首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同食用胶与牛肉糜结合力及凝胶性能的比较
引用本文:赵改名,孟子晴,祝超智,田玮,韩明山,于智威. 不同食用胶与牛肉糜结合力及凝胶性能的比较[J]. 现代食品科技, 2020, 36(4): 185-191. DOI: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.4.025
作者姓名:赵改名  孟子晴  祝超智  田玮  韩明山  于智威
作者单位:河南农业大学食品科学技术学院,河南郑州450002,河南农业大学食品科学技术学院,河南郑州450002,河南农业大学食品科学技术学院,河南郑州450002,河南农业大学牧医工程学院,河南郑州450002,通辽综合试验站,内蒙古通辽028000;内蒙古科尔沁牛业股份有限公司,内蒙古通辽028000,河南农业大学食品科学技术学院,河南郑州450002
基金项目:国家肉牛牦牛产业技术体系项目(CARS-37); 河南省重大科技专项(161100110800)
摘    要:为解决牛肉糜类产品失水析油、结构疏松的问题,通过设置空白对照组、3 g/kg瓜尔豆胶组、3 g/kg魔芋胶组、3 g/kg卡拉胶组,测定蒸煮损失、水分迁移、质构、扫描电镜的微观结构等,研究胶体结合牛肉糜能力对结构的影响。结果表明,在蒸煮损失、总汁液流失、水分损失、脂肪损失方面,瓜儿豆胶组比空白对照组分别下降了2.44%、5.93%、5.92%、1.42%。三种胶体在结合肉糜能力上表现为瓜儿豆胶组>魔芋胶组=卡拉胶组>空白对照组。空白对照组的硬度为27286.00 g,瓜尔豆胶组、魔芋胶组、卡拉胶组硬度分别下降至空白组的32.33%、55.58%、83.30%。空白对照组、瓜尔豆胶组、魔芋胶组、卡拉胶组的a^*分别为8.35、10.17、10.26、9.76;植物源胶体的T22均比空白对照组小(p<0.05),说明添加胶体后,对质子运动的束缚程度提高。微观结构上,瓜尔豆胶组与魔芋胶组脂肪颗粒均匀分布于整个网络中,几乎没有大空洞。结论:3 g/kg瓜尔豆胶组结合牛肉糜能力最高,对结构影响最大。

关 键 词:牛肉糜  胶体  结合特性  结构  凝胶性能
收稿时间:2019-10-11

Comparison of the Binding and Gel Properties between Different Edible Gums and Beef Paste
ZHAO Gai-ming,MENG Zi-qing,ZHU Chao-zhi,TIAN Wei,HAN Ming-shan,YU Zhi-wei. Comparison of the Binding and Gel Properties between Different Edible Gums and Beef Paste[J]. Modern Food Science & Technology, 2020, 36(4): 185-191. DOI: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.4.025
Authors:ZHAO Gai-ming  MENG Zi-qing  ZHU Chao-zhi  TIAN Wei  HAN Ming-shan  YU Zhi-wei
Affiliation:(1.College of Food Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China);(2.College of Animal Husbandry and Medical Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China);(3.Tongliao Comprehensive Experimental Station, Tongliao 028000, China)(4.Inner Mongolia Kerqin Cattle Co., Ltd., Tongliao 028000, China)
Abstract:In order to resolve the problems associated with the water loss, oil loss and loose structure of beef meat mince products, the effects of the binding between a gum gel and beef meat mince on the structure of mince products were studied through setting up the blank control group, 3 g/kg guar gum group, 3 g/kg konjac group and 3 g/kg carrageenan group, and measuring the cooking loss, water migration, texture and microstructure (scanning electron microscopy). The results showed that the cooking loss, total juice loss, water loss and fat loss of the guar gum group decreased by 2.44%, 5.93%, 5.92%, and 1.42%, respectively, compared with the blank control. The mince-binding ability of the three gums was in the order of the guar gum group>konjac group = carrageenan group > blank control group. The hardness of the blank control group was 27286.00 g, with that of the guar gum group, konjac group and carrageenan group decreasing to 32.33%, 55.58% and 83.30% of the blank group respectively. The a* values of the blank control group, guar gum group, konjac group and carrageenan group were 8.35, 10.17, 10.26 and 9.76, respectively. The T22 values of the plant-derived gums were smaller than that of the blank control group (p < 0.05), indicating that the degree of restriction upon proton movements increased after the addition of a plant-derived gum. In terms of microstructure, fat particles of the guar gum group and the konjac gum group were evenly distributed throughout the network, with almost no large voids. In conclusion: The 3 g/kg guar gum group had the highest mince-binding ability and exhibited the greatest impact on the structure.
Keywords:beef minced meat   gum   binding characteristics   structure   gel properties
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代食品科技》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代食品科技》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号