| Abstract: | A group's staffing level can play an important role in its socialization practices. For example, a group that is understaffed should be more open than an overstaffed group to both prospective and new members. To test this prediction, the leaders of nearly 100 student groups on a college campus were interviewed. These interviews yielded qualitative and quantitative data about the staffing levels in the groups and the methods that they used for recruiting prospective members and assimilating new ones. Analyses of the qualitative data clarified issues such as when understaffing and overstaffing are likely to occur, what kinds of problems they produce in groups, and how groups try to solve those problems. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that our prediction was correct: As their staffing levels decrease, most groups become more open to prospective and new members. Implications of the results are discussed, and some suggestions for future research are offered. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
