Influence of Nonplastic Fines on Shear Wave Velocity-Based Assessment of Liquefaction

Many false positives (no liquefaction detected when the normalized shear wave velocity-cyclic stress ratio (Vs1-CSR) combination indicated that it should have been) are observed in the database used in the simplified liquefaction assessment procedure based on shear wave velocity. Two possible reasons for false positives are the presence of a thick surface layer of nonliquefiable soil and the effects of fines on cyclic shear resistance (CRR) and Vs1. About 67% of the false positives that could not have been caused by an overlying thick surface layer are associated with silty sands with less than 35% fines. The effects of fines on the liquefaction resistance of silty sands and on the shear wave velocity are analyzed. Theoretical CRRfield?versus?Vs1 curves for silty sands containing 0 to 15% nonplastic fines are established. They show that the theoretical CRR-Vs1 correlations for silty sands with 5 to 15% nonplastic fines are all located to the far left of the semi-empirical curves that separate liquefaction from no-liquefaction zones in the simplified liquefaction potential assessment procedures. The results suggest the currently used shear wave velocity-based liquefaction potential curves may be overly conservative when applied to sands containing nonplastic fines.