Neonatal nucleated red blood cell and lymphocyte counts in fetal brain injury

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Flexible die materials have been introduced to facilitate the fabrication of indirect provisional or definitive restorations in 1 appointment. PURPOSE: This study compared the surface detail reproduction of 7 potential flexible die materials when used in combination with 7 elastomeric impression materials. METHODS: Surface detail reproduction of 17 impression material/flexible die material systems was compared with a control system containing an elastomeric impression material and a Type IV dental stone. Test dies of each system were prepared in a random order with the American Dental Association apparatus for testing detail reproduction, compatibility, and dimensional stability. RESULTS: One flexible die system had better surface detail reproduction than the control stone die, other systems had similar or worse reproduction. Surface detail reproduction was adversely affected when a separator was required between the impression and flexible die material. CONCLUSIONS: Impregum F die material with Extrude Light impression material produced better surface detail reproduction than the control dies. Impregum F impressions were incompatible with Blu-Mousse, Impregum F, or Imprint die materials. Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were incompatible with polyvinyl siloxane dies unless a separator was used. When a separator was used, the surface detail reproduction was not as good as the control die system or the Extrude Light impression material/Impregum F die material combination.