首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于天宫一号高光谱成像仪的替代光谱定标方法精度对比分析
引用本文:张雅琼,张文娟,陈正超,张兵.基于天宫一号高光谱成像仪的替代光谱定标方法精度对比分析[J].红外与毫米波学报,2015,34(3):360-367.
作者姓名:张雅琼  张文娟  陈正超  张兵
作者单位:1. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所数字地球重点实验室,北京100094;中国科学院大学,北京100049
2. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所数字地球重点实验室,北京,100094
基金项目:中科院对地观测中心主任基金-,国家自然科学基金,Director Foundation of center for earth observation and digital earth of CAS,National Natural Science Foundation of China
摘    要:基于天宫一号高光谱成像仪2012年3月6日获取的可见近红外谱段数据,分别进行了氧气吸收通道的同步和非同步替代光谱定标,为了提高非同步替代光谱定标结果的可靠性,利用与同步实验日期相近的另外两景图像进行了多次非同步替代光谱定标.结果表明:基于三景图像的非同步替代光谱定标结果相近,差异小于0.2 nm,标准差小于0.11;同步和非同步两种替代光谱定标结果差异小于0.3 nm;以星上定标结果为基准,两种替代光谱定标方法的误差分别为0.384 nm和0.489 nm,二者差异较小.可见,可采用非同步替代光谱定标方法对高光谱成像仪进行高频次的光谱定标.

关 键 词:高光谱成像仪  替代定标  光谱定标  精度对比
收稿时间:4/7/2014 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2014/5/11 0:00:00

A comparative analysis of the accuracy of alternative spectral calibration methods based on TG-1 hyperspectral imager
ZHANG Ya-Qiong,ZHANG Wen-Juan,CHEN Zheng-Chao and ZHANG Bing.A comparative analysis of the accuracy of alternative spectral calibration methods based on TG-1 hyperspectral imager[J].Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves,2015,34(3):360-367.
Authors:ZHANG Ya-Qiong  ZHANG Wen-Juan  CHEN Zheng-Chao and ZHANG Bing
Affiliation:ZHANG Ya-Qiong;ZHANG Wen-Juan;CHEN Zheng-Chao;ZHANG Bing;Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science,Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth,Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
Abstract:Based on the visible near-infrared (VNIR) data acquired by TG-1 hyperspectral imager on March 6, 2012, synchronous and non-synchronous alternative spectral calibration were assessed at the oxygen band. In order to improve the reliability of non-synchronous alternative spectral calibration result, other two images with similar imaging date were used to achieve multiple calibrations. The results show that non-synchronous alternative spectral calibration results based on three images are similar, difference is less than 0.2nm, and standard deviation is less than 0.11. Difference between synchronous and non-synchronous alternative spectral calibration results is less than 0.3nm. Compared with the TG-1 on-board spectral calibration results, the error of the two alternative spectral calibration methods is 0.384nm and 0.489nm, respectively. The accuracy difference is relatively small. Non-synchronous alternative spectral calibration method can be used to achieve high-frequency spectral calibration for hyperspectral imager.
Keywords:hyperspectral imager  alternative calibration  spectral calibration  accuracy comparison
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《红外与毫米波学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《红外与毫米波学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号