MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human–Automation Co-ordination |
| |
Authors: | S W A Dekker D D Woods |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Link?ping Institute of Technology, Link?ping, Sweden, SE Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, US
|
| |
Abstract: | In this paper we argue that substitution-based function allocation methods (such as MABA-MABA, or Men-Are-Better-At/Machines-Are-Better-At
lists) cannot provide progress on human–automation co-ordination. Quantitative ‘who does what’ allocation does not work because
the real effects of automation are qualitative: it transforms human practice and forces people to adapt their skills and routines.
Rather than re-inventing or refining substitution-based methods, we propose that the more pressing question on human–automation
co-ordination is ‘How do we make them get along together?’
Correspondence and offprint requests to: S. W. A. Dekker, Department of Mechanical Engineering, IKP, Link?ping Institute of Technology, SE - 581 83 Link?ping, Sweden.
Tel.: +46 13 281646; fax +4613282579; email: sidde@ikp.liu.se |
| |
Keywords: | : Automation – Cognition – Computers – Co-ordination – Function allocation – Human error |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|