Pupil detection for head-mounted eye tracking in the wild: an evaluation of the state of the art

Robust and accurate detection of the pupil position is a key building block for head-mounted eye tracking and prerequisite for applications on top, such as gaze-based human–computer interaction or attention analysis. Despite a large body of work, detecting the pupil in images recorded under real-world conditions is challenging given significant variability in the eye appearance (e.g., illumination, reflections, occlusions, etc.), individual differences in eye physiology, as well as other sources of noise, such as contact lenses or make-up. In this paper we review six state-of-the-art pupil detection methods, namely ElSe (Fuhl et al. in Proceedings of the ninth biennial ACM symposium on eye tracking research & applications, ACM. New York, NY, USA, pp 123–130, 2016), ExCuSe (Fuhl et al. in Computer analysis of images and patterns. Springer, New York, pp 39–51, 2015), Pupil Labs (Kassner et al. in Adjunct proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing (UbiComp), pp 1151–1160, 2014. doi: 10.1145/2638728.2641695), SET (Javadi et al. in Front Neuroeng 8, 2015), Starburst (Li et al. in Computer vision and pattern recognition-workshops, 2005. IEEE Computer society conference on CVPR workshops. IEEE, pp 79–79, 2005), and ?wirski (?wirski et al. in Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications (ETRA). ACM, pp 173–176, 2012. doi: 10.1145/2168556.2168585). We compare their performance on a large-scale data set consisting of 225,569 annotated eye images taken from four publicly available data sets. Our experimental results show that the algorithm ElSe (Fuhl et al. 2016) outperforms other pupil detection methods by a large margin, offering thus robust and accurate pupil positions on challenging everyday eye images.