核电厂操纵员心理干预与一般心理咨询的异同

为了解核电厂操纵员心理干预工作与一般人群心理干预的异同,将研究对象初次心理访谈报告及功能大体评定(GAF)量表结果全部纳入研究范围,由一名资深动力学取向心理咨询师从报告中提取被访谈者或来访者初次访谈时对访谈性质的理解与期待、本人自我功能与力量、主要困难的性质和内容的信息录入数据库,社会功能水平采用GAF量表来评定,分为操纵员组和来访者组进行统计分析。结果表明,两组在对访谈性质的理解与期待、本人自我功能与力量、主要困难的性质和内容及社会功能水平方面均存在显著差异。操纵员心理访谈工作与常规心理咨询工作的侧重点不同,参与心理访谈的操纵员对访谈的目标有清晰、准确的预估,对心理访谈性质的理解与期待的差异,深刻地影响着心理访谈工作,一定程度上制约了操纵员更合理、有效地使用临床心理资源。建立劳动保障—科普宣教—专业心理援助资源三位一体的科学、完善的心理健康支持系统更有利于操纵员群体的心理健康。

Similarities and Differences between Psychological Intervention of Nuclear Power Plant Operators and General Psychological Counseling

Through the analysis of the research subjects' initial psychological interview report and the results of the General Assessment of Function (GAF) scale, it is found that there were significant differences betweenoperators and the general populationin the understanding and expectation of the nature of the interview, self-function and strength, the nature and content of the main difficulties, and the level of socipopulation. The operators participating in the psychological interview have a clear and accurate estimation of the interview goal. The difference in understanding and expectation of the nature of the psychological interview has a profound impact on the psychological interview work, to a certain extent, restricts operators from using clinical psychological resources more reasonably and effectively. The establishment of a scientific and complete mental health support system of labor security-science education-professional psychological assistance resources is more conducive to the mental health of the operator group.