|
|||||
|
|
| 核电厂核2级承压管道抗震设计规范对比分析 | |
| 引用本文： | 白文婷,戴君武,冯国忠,荣峰. 核电厂核2级承压管道抗震设计规范对比分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2011, 32(5): 59-63,68 |
| 作者姓名： | 白文婷 戴君武 冯国忠 荣峰 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,哈尔滨,150080;中国核电工程有限公司河北分公司,石家庄,050021 2. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,哈尔滨,150080 3. 中国核电工程有限公司河北分公司,石家庄,050021 4. 中核第四研究设计工程有限公司,石家庄,050021 |
| 摘 要： | RCC-M、ASME(2007版)及GB 50267-97为目前核电厂设备、系统、部件设计所遵循的主要技术标准,3者对核电厂部件的分级基本相当,在核2级承压管道设计方面的规定内容相似但不完全相同.在地震输入方法上,GB 50267-97、ASME(2007版)及RCC-M基本相同,GB 50267-97中硬土场地的水平... |
| 关 键 词： | 核电厂 管道设计 抗震设计 规范 对比 |
Contrast of Aseismic Design for NPP Pressure Pipelines of Class 2 |
|
| BAI Wen-ting,DAI Jun-wu,FENG Guo-zhong,RONG Feng. Contrast of Aseismic Design for NPP Pressure Pipelines of Class 2[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2011, 32(5): 59-63,68 | |
| Authors: | BAI Wen-ting DAI Jun-wu FENG Guo-zhong RONG Feng |
| Affiliation: | BAI Wen-ting1,2,DAI Jun-wu1,FENG Guo-zhong2,RONG Feng3 (1.Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,Harbin 150080,China,2.China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Hebei Branch,Shijiazhuang,050021,3.The Forth Institute of Nuclear Engineering of CNNC,Shijiazhuang 050021,China) |
| Abstract: | At present,the RCC-M of French,ASME(2007) of U.S.A and GB50267-97 of China are the primary nuclear technical codes for the design of facilities,systems,and components,which are similar in the classification of nuclear facilities in nuclear power plants,but are not exactly the same in the piping design clauses of the class 2 pressure pipeline.For the earthquake input methods,GB,ASME and RCC-M are basically similar.The hard soil standard response spectrum of GB is relatively safer.RCC-M emphasizes on the impa... |
| Keywords: | Nuclear power plants Piping design Aseismic design Code Contrast |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |