The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies. |
| |
Authors: | Maxwell Scott E. |
| |
Abstract: | Underpowered studies persist in the psychological literature. This article examines reasons for their persistence and the effects on efforts to create a cumulative science. The "curse of multiplicities" plays a central role in the presentation. Most psychologists realize that testing multiple hypotheses in a single study affects the Type I error rate, but corresponding implications for power have largely been ignored. The presence of multiple hypothesis tests leads to 3 different conceptualizations of power. Implications of these 3 conceptualizations are discussed from the perspective of the individual researcher and from the perspective of developing a coherent literature. Supplementing significance tests with effect size measures and confidence intervals is shown to address some but not necessarily all problems associated with multiple testing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
| |
Keywords: | psychological research underpowered studies statistical power multiple hypothesis testing effect size measures confidence intervals Type I error rates |
|
|