| Abstract: | 35 self-selected 11–14 yr olds learned LOGO for 1 wk in 3-person groups that were homogeneous with respect to previous experience with computers. A battery of cognitive pretests yielded different profiles that were used to predict different programming outcomes. Ss were posttested for achievement. Results show that mathematics ability was the best predictor of knowledge of syntax, interpreting graphics programs, and generating relations programs. Spatial ability was the best predictor of knowledge of basic commands. A combination of spatial ability and field independence best predicted generating graphics programs. Of 11 group process variables examined, 5 predicted programming outcomes: receiving explanations in response to errors (positively related), receiving explanations in response to questions (negatively related), not receiving explanations after an error (negatively related), receiving no response to a question (negatively related), and time at the keyboard (positively related). No student demographic characteristic or ability was related to the 5 group process variables. (34 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
