| Abstract: | Compared the relative effectiveness of 2 interventions in the treatment of marital discord: a cognitive-behavioral intervention that focused on teaching problem-solving skills and an experiential intervention that focused on emotional experiences underlying interaction patterns. 45 couples seeking therapy were randomly assigned to 1 of these treatments or to a wait-list control group. Each treatment was administered in 8 sessions by 6 experienced therapists whose interventions were monitored and rated to ensure treatment fidelity. Assessment measures included the Dyadic Adjustment Scale; Couples Therapy Alliance Scale; and tests of emotional style, target complaints, goal attainment, and intimacy. Results indicate that the perceived strength of the working alliance between couples and therapists and of general therapists effectiveness were equivalent across treatment groups and that both treatment groups made significant gains over untreated controls on measures of goal attainment, marital adjustment, intimacy levels, and target complaint reduction. The effects of the emotionally focused treatment were superior to those of the problem-solving treatment on marital adjustment, intimacy, and target complaint level. At follow-up, marital adjustment scores in the emotionally focused group were still significantly higher than those in the problem-solving group. (36 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
