Impedance of a porous electrode with an axial gradient of concentration |
| |
Authors: | Michel Keddam Christiane Rakotomavo Hisasi Takenouti |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Groupe de Recherche No. 4 du CNRS Physique des Liquides et Electrochimie, associé à l'Université P. & M. Curie, 4 place Jussieu, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France |
| |
Abstract: | When the impedance is measured on a battery, an inductive impedance is often observed in a high frequency range. This inductance is frequently related to the cell geometry and electrical leads. However, certain authors claimed that this inductance is due to the concentration distribution of reacting species through the pores of battery electrodes. Their argument is based on a paper in which a fundamental error was committed. Hence, the impedance is re-calculated on the basis of the same principle. The model shows that though the diffusion process plays an outstanding role, the overall reaction rate is never completely limited by this process. The faradaic impedance due to the concentration distribution is capacitive. Therefore, the inductive impedance observed on battery systems cannot be, by any means, attributed to the concentration distribution inside the pores. Little frequency distribution is found and the impedance is close to a semi-circle. Therefore depressed impedance diagrams in porous electrodes without forced convection cannot be ascribed to either a Warburg nor a Warburg-de Levie behaviour.Nomenclature A D¦C¦ (mole cm s–1) - B j+K¦C¦ (mole cm s–1) - b Tafel coefficient (V–1) - C(x) Concentration ofS in a pore at depthx (mole cm–3) - C0 Concentration ofS in the solution bulk (mole cm–3) - C C(x) change under a voltage perturbation (mole cm–3) - ¦C¦ Amplitude of C (mole cm–3) - D Diffusion coefficient (cm2 s–1) - E Electrode potential (V) - E Small perturbation inE namely a sine-wave signal (V) - ¦E¦ Amplitude of E(V) - F Faraday constant (96500 A s mol–1) - F(x) Space separate variable forC - f Frequency in Hz (s–1) - g(x) KC(x)¦E¦(mole cm s–1) - I Apparent current density (A cm–2) - Ist Steady-state current per unit surface of pore aperture (A cm–2) - j Imaginary unit [(–1)1/2] - K Pseudo-homogeneous rate constant (s–1) - K Potential derivative ofK, dK/dE (s–1 V–1) - K* Heterogeneous reaction rate constant (cm s–1) - L Pore depth (cm) - n Reaction order - P Reaction product - p Parameter forF(x), see Equation 13 - q Parameter forF(x), see Equation 13 - Re Electrolyte resistance (ohm cm) - Rp Polarization resistance per unit surface of pore aperture (ohm cm2) - Rt Charge transfer resistance per unit surface of pore aperture (ohm cm2) - S Reacting species - Sa Total surface of pore apertures (cm2) - S0 Geometrical surface area - Sp Developed surface area of porous electrode per unit volume (cm2 cm–3) - s Concentration gradient (mole cm–3 cm–1) - t Time - U Ohmic drop - x Distance from pore aperture (cm) - Z Faradaic impedance per unit surface of pore aperture (ohm cm2) - Zx Local impedance per unit pore length (ohm cm3) - z Charge transfer number - Porosity - Thickness of Nernst diffusion layer - Penetration depth of reacting species (cm) - Penetration depth of a.c. signal determined by the potential distribution (cm) - Electrolyte (solution) resistivity (ohm cm) - 0 Flow of S at the pore aperture (mole cm2 s–1) - Angular freqeuncy of a.c. signal, 2f(s–1) - Integration constant |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|