Overall efficiency comparison between the fueling methods of SAEJ2601 using dynamic simulations |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components and Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Component Technology, School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei, 430070, China;2. Hydrogen Research Institute, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada;1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components and Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Component Technology, School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei 430070, China;2. Hydrogen Research Institute, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada;1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran;1. Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;2. School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;3. Beijing JONTON Hydrogen Technology Company, Beijing 100085, China;1. Research Center for Hydrogen Industrial Use and Storage (HYDROGENIUS), Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;3. International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saga University, Saga, Japan |
| |
| Abstract: | This study concerns MC Formula and the table-based protocol hydrogen fueling methods described in SAE J2601 2016 edition fueling protocols for light duty gaseous hydrogen surface vehicles. It considers the overall efficiency and performance of the two methods. This is achieved by dynamic simulations, using the Dymola hydrogen fueling station library. The MC formula and table-based methods are implemented in the library and different simulations are performed, to evaluate the performance of the two different fueling methods under various conditions. The efficiency is evaluated according to; fueling time, State of Charge levels and total energy consumption. The MC formula is up to 26% faster. The state of charge levels are similar between the table-based and MC formula. The energy consumption for the MC formula is up to 6.9% higher than for the table-based method. Comparing consecutive fuelings without recharging the station, the table-based method is able to fill 7 vehicles and the MC formula 5 vehicles. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hydrogen fueling SAE J2601 Hydrogen vehicle MC formula Hydrogen fueling protocols |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
