Factors explaining why people join, remain in, or leave a scholarly society: The Canadian Psychological Association.

Both theory and subject matter experts were used to generate items for a survey designed to increase understanding of why psychologists join, remain in, or leave the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA). The subject matter experts included current, former, and nonmember psychologists. 2,200 questionnaires were distributed by e-mail, and 275 were sent by surface mail. The response rates were 20% and 29% for e-mail and surface mail, respectively. Principal components analysis of the survey items resulted in 5 factors: outcomes, advocacy, organizational justice, annual convention, and professional recognition. Discriminant function analysis results showed that, on the basis of these factors, the authors were able to correctly classify respondents as current vs former members, and current vs never been members. Current members, former members, and psychologists who never joined CPA were found to differ significantly on their rating of most factors. The factors relevant for retaining members differ from those that attract psychologists to join CPA. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)