Challenges and Rewards in Using Parametric or Concatenative Speech Synthesis

Highest quality synthetic voices remain scarce in both parametric synthesis systems and in concatenative ones. Much synthetic speech lacks naturalness, pleasantness and flexibility. While great strides have been made over the past few years in the quality of synthetic speech, there is still much work that needs to be done. Now the major challenges facing developers are how to provide optimal size, performance, extensibility, and flexibility, together with developing improved signal processing techniques. This paper focuses on issues of performance and flexibility against a background containing a brief evolution of speech synthesis; some acoustic, phonetic and linguistic issues; and the merits and demerits of two commonly used synthesis techniques: parametric and concatenative. Shortcomings of both techniques are reviewed. Methodological developments in the variable size, selection and specification of the speech units used in concatenative systems are explored and shown to provide a more positive outlook for more natural, bearable synthetic speech. Differentiating considerations in making and improving concatenative systems are explored and evaluated. Acoustic and sociophonetic criteria are reviewed for the improvement of variable synthetic voices, and a ranking of their relative importance is suggested. Future rewards are weighed against current technical and developmental challenges. The conclusion indicates some of the current and future applications of TTS.