Distributed priority ranking of strategic preliminary requirements for management information systems in economic organizations |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Business Informatics, Warsaw School of Economy, Warsaw, Poland;2. School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1;1. Google Inc, Mountain View, USA;2. Department of Computer Science, Lund University, Sweden;1. Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women''s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA;1. Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow 107005, Russia;2. Joint Institute of High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 125412, Russia;1. FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, 106 48 Stockholm, Sweden;2. Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden;1. Universidade de Passo Fundo, Graduate Program on Business Administration and Graduate Program on Environmental Sciences, Rodovia BR 285, Km 292,7, S/n - São José, Passo Fundo, RS, 99052-900, Brazil;2. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Industrial Engineering Department, Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5, Andar, 90035-190, Porto Alegre, Brazil |
| |
| Abstract: | The development and construction of a management information system (MIS) is a complex task. Selection of the correct requirements to be implemented in the MIS is a serious problem. The problem is made even more difficult by inadequate methods of requirements priority ranking. This paper describes instruments for distributed priority ranking of strategic preliminary requirements for MISs in organizations, profit-making or non-profit making, that are involved in the economy. The instrument consists of a metamethod that combines several methods, each accomplishing a different subtask of the priority ranking. A Web-based tool is provided to assist the requirements engineers in applying the instrument with a distributed group of stakeholders. The instrument and the tool are validated as effective by their use in an effort to create requirements for the management information system for city government. The paper reports lessons learned in this validation exercise. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
