Agroecological analysis and economic benefit of organic resources and fertiliser in till and no-till sorghum production after a 6-year fallow in semi-arid West Africa |
| |
Authors: | Elisée Ouédraogo Leo Stroosnijder Abdoulaye Mando Lijbert Brussaard Robert Zougmoré |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Departement Agroecologie, Centre Ecologique Albert Schweitzer – Burkina Faso (CEAS-BF), 01 B.P. 3306, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso;(2) Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherche Agricole (INERA), 04 B.P. 8645, Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso;(3) Erosion and Soil & Water Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Nieuwe Kanaal 11, 6709 PA Wageningen, The Netherlands;(4) Division Afrique, International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development (IFDC), B.P. 4483, Lome, Togo;(5) Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8005, 6700 EC Wageningen, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | A field experiment was conducted in Gampela (Burkina Faso) in 2000 and 2001 to assess the impact of organic and mineral sources
of nutrients and combinations thereof in optimising crop production in till and no-till systems and to assess the economic
benefit of these options. The study showed that under conditions of rainfall deficiency, the use of a single organic resource
at an equivalent dose of 40 kg N ha−1 better secured crop yield than the application of an equivalent amount as urea-N, while a combination of organic resources
and fertiliser was better in increasing crop yield than the application of the same N amount in the form of urea. In a year
of rainfall deficiency, a mix of organic resources and fertiliser in both till and no-till systems increased crop water use
efficiency, with the result that the farmer was able to purchase only half of the normal quantity of N fertiliser to obtain
a higher yield that he would have done when all of the N was supplied in the form of urea. Under conditions where soil N is
deficient, an economic benefit was achieved when urea was combined with easily decomposable organic material (e.g. sheep dung);
mixing the urea at a dose of 40 kg N ha−1 with maize straw was not sufficient in alleviating the negative interaction due to the enhanced N immobilisation. The results
demonstrate that the use of N fertiliser alone was risky and that a higher yield, with the accompanying economic benefit,
was scarcely achieved under the prevailing rainfall conditions. The application of soil and water conservation measures can
contribute greatly to increasing the economic benefit of mineral, organic or combined organic and mineral-derived nutrient
application under semi-arid conditions. |
| |
Keywords: | Burkina Faso Economic benefit Fertiliser Nitrogen use efficiency Organic resources Tillage Water use efficiency |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|