Does hemodiafiltration reduce vascular stiffness measured by aortic pulse wave velocity compared with high‐flux hemodialysis? |
| |
Authors: | Evangelia Charitaki Andrew Davenport |
| |
Affiliation: | UCL Centre for Nephrology, University College London Medical School, , London, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Hemodialfiltration (HDF) has been reported to reduce the frequency of intradialytic hypotension compared with hemodialysis (HD). We wished to determine whether HDF resulted in improvement of arterial stiffness compared with HD. We reviewed peripheral blood pressure and pulse wave velocity measurements in a cross‐sectional analysis of stable HDF and HD outpatients. One hundred forty‐one HDF patients were matched to 148 HD patients in terms of age, sex, prevalence of diabetes, peripheral blood pressure, and body mass. Pulse wave velocity was not different between the HD and HDF cohorts (median 9.1 8.0–10.7] m/s vs. 9.7 8.5–11.6] m/s). Similarly, there were no differences in central aortic pressure (149.2 ± 30.9 mmHg vs. 151.9 ± 35.2 mmHg), or aortic (39 25.1–51.2]% vs. 38.6 25.8–51.4]%) and brachial (3.8 ?24.3 to 26.9]% vs. 3 ?22.4 to 27.1]%) augmentation indices, respectively. Pulse wave velocity did not differ between adult patients treated by HD and HDF, and similarly, there were no differences in central aortic pressure, aortic or brachial augmentation indices, and cardiac diastolic perfusion. Our study suggests that HDF does not appear to offer any benefit over HD in terms of vascular stiffness. |
| |
Keywords: | Hypertension hemodialysis hemodiafiltration pulse wave velocity vascular calcification |
|
|