首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The advantage of using in-situ methods for studying hydrogen mass transport: Neutron radiography vs. carrier gas hot extraction
Authors:Axel Griesche,Eusebio Soló  rzano,Katrin Beyer,Thomas Kannengiesser
Affiliation:1. Dept. Component Safety, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany;2. Dept. Condensed Matter Physics, University of Valladolid, Paseo de Belén 7, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
Abstract:Neutron radiography (NR) is compared with the commonly used carrier gas hot extraction (CGHE) technique. We performed isothermal hydrogen effusion experiments at 623 K to study the mass transport kinetics. The investigated material was technical iron. The quantification of the hydrogen mass flow is done for NR by using concentration standards. The temporal hydrogen concentration evolution in the sample coincides well for both methods, i.e. NR and CGHE, and is in good agreement with literature. The advantages of the NR method are the non-destructive nature of measuring and the in-situ determination of hydrogen concentrations with high spatial and temporal resolution. Remaining hydrogen inside the sample can be identified directly by the NR method.
Keywords:Hydrogen diffusion   In-situ   Neutron radiography   Carrier gas hot extraction   Imaging
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号