| 220kV输电线路采用钢芯铝绞线与碳纤维导线的方案比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李孝林.220kV输电线路采用钢芯铝绞线与碳纤维导线的方案比较[J].内蒙古电力技术,2014,32(6):38-41. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李孝林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内蒙古电力勘测设计院有限责任公司,呼和浩特,010020 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在黑河—和林220 k V输电线路工程中,针对采用钢芯铝绞线(JL/G1A-400/35)、碳纤维导线(ACCC/LH-185/25、ACCC/LH-210/35、ACCC/LH-240/35)4种导线设计方案中的线路输送容量、电阻损耗、工程造价和年费用进行了计算对比分析。结果认为:虽然4种导线均能满足输送容量的要求,但JL/G1A-400/35型钢芯铝绞线静态投资低、年费用最低,且电阻损耗小,具有良好的节能效果,因此在该工程中推荐采用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 碳纤维导线 钢芯铝绞线 交流电阻 年费用 输电线路 电阻损耗 静态投资 |
Scheme Comparison between ACSR and Carbon Fiber Wire in 220 kV Transmission Line |
| |
| Li Xiaolin.Scheme Comparison between ACSR and Carbon Fiber Wire in 220 kV Transmission Line[J].Inner Mongolia Electric Power,2014,32(6):38-41. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Xiaolin |
| |
| Affiliation: | Li Xiaolin (Inner Mongolia Electric Power Survey ＆ Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010020) |
| |
| Abstract: | In Heihe-Helin 220 kV transmission line project, the application of ACSR （JL/G1A-400/35）, 4 different carbon fiber wires （ACCC/LH-185/25, ACCC/LH-210/35, ACCC/LH-240/35）, by comparing and analysing its transmission capacity, resistive losses, project cost and annual cost, although the four kinds of wires all could meet the transport capacity requirements, but ACSR JL/G1A-400/35 static investment was low, annual cost was minimal, and the resistance loss had a good enerev saving effect. |
| |
| Keywords: | carbon fiber wire ACSR AC resistance annual cost transmission line resistance loss static investment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
