Le premier vocabulaire de sciences cognitives en langue fran?aise.

Reviews the book, Vocabulaire de sciences cognitives by O. Houdé, D. Kayser, O. Koenig, J. Proust, and F. Rastier (1998). The Vocabulaire de sciences cognitives contains 130 alphabetically ordered entries, each entry corresponding to a different word or expression used in cognitive science. The entries are treated from the point of view of each of the five main disciplines contributing to cognitive science: artificial intelligence, neuroscience, linguistics, philosophy, and psychology. The texts concerning a given entry form distinct sections labeled with the name of the discipline concerned. Numerous cross-references to related entries are given. Overall, the Vocabulaire contains about 200 different texts, a third of which have been authored by the members of the editorial board, each of whom is specialized in one of the disciplines mentioned; the remaining texts were written by 54 other authors from these various fields. Of the 130 entries, only 2 very pivotal terms in cognitive science (FUNCTION and REPRESENTATION) receive complete multidisciplinary treatment; 15 entries referring mostly to major cognitive functions (e.g., LANGUAGE, LEARNING, MEMORY, PERCEPTION, REASONING) are covered by three or four disciplines, and 31 others receive a bidisciplinary treatment. Analysis of the 144 pairs of disciplines found in these 48 entries shows the neighborhood among disciplines to be fairly evenly distributed except in the case of psychology and neuroscience, whose greater conceptual proximity is explained by the fact that most neuroscience texts have been written by neuropsychologists. The contributions of the various disciplines were reviewed by one specialist and by at least one nonspecialist. Although predictably more critical, the specialists did not identify many serious problems or errors. However, the reviewers expressed some reservations concerning the choice of the terms deemed worth of an entry, the limited number of disciplines contributing to some entries, the variable length and nature of the texts, as well as the exaggerated place sometimes given to secondary research. If the Vocabulaire de sciences cognitives does not constitute a monumental achievement, it is nonetheless an impressive piece of work, especially considering the breadth and state of the domain. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)