首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于Geo-studio的尾矿坝渗流及地震动力响应研究
引用本文:孙从露,徐洪,郭晓霞.基于Geo-studio的尾矿坝渗流及地震动力响应研究[J].矿冶工程,2017,37(6):30-34.
作者姓名:孙从露  徐洪  郭晓霞
作者单位:1.重庆地质矿产研究院 外生成矿与矿山环境重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 400042; 2.大连理工大学 工业装备结构分析国家重点实验室, 辽宁 大连 116023
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41202252); 重庆市国土资源与房屋管理局科技计划项目(CQGT-KJ-2015048, CQGT-KJ-2014046)
摘    要:利用Geo-studio软件, 对尾矿坝的稳态渗流和地震动力响应进行了计算。结果表明, 2个计算断面在正常水位和洪水位运行时的浸润线埋深均较浅, 坝体自由面较高, 水力坡降值在初期坝下游靠近坝基部位最大, 超过规范值, 水从初期坝坝面溢出, 可能发生流土或管涌; 动力加速度在2个断面均未呈现明显放大, 动应力只在局部区域出现较大值, 坝体整体动力稳定性较高; 地震响应下, 最终坝高不发生液化, 二级子坝库区局部发生液化, 坝体整体不会出现液化造成的动力破坏。鉴于初期坝下游坝基水力坡降较大, 建议采取坝体深部排水措施(如水平排水管、辐射井等), 降低坝体的自由面, 提高坝体稳定性, 有效杜绝渗透破坏乃至溃坝事件。

关 键 词:Geo-studio  尾矿坝  渗流  浸润线  动力响应  
收稿时间:2017-05-30

Seepage Calculation and Seismic Dynamic Response Analysis for A Tailings Dam Based on Geo-studio
SUN Cong-lu,XU Hong,GUO Xiao-xia.Seepage Calculation and Seismic Dynamic Response Analysis for A Tailings Dam Based on Geo-studio[J].Mining and Metallurgical Engineering,2017,37(6):30-34.
Authors:SUN Cong-lu  XU Hong  GUO Xiao-xia
Affiliation:1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Exogenic Mineralization and Mine Environment, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
Abstract:The steady state seepage and seismic dynamic response of tailings dam were calculated by using Geo-studio software. Results illustrate that the cover depth of the phreatic line is relatively shallow for two calculated sections in case of normal water level and flood level, and the dam has a higher free face. Hydraulic gradient is maximum at downstream of the starter dam close to the foundation,exceeding the normative values. The water overflows from the surface of the starter dam, which possibly results in soil flow or piping. Dynamic acceleration of two sections shows no significant amplification, and a larger dynamic stress only occurs in local area, leading to overall dam with relatively high dynamic stability. Under the circumstances of seismic dynamic response, liquefaction won't occur at the final height of the dam, but occur in the part areas of sub-dam reservoir (second level), without any dynamic failure occurred to the overall dam due to liquefaction. In view of the larger hydraulic gradient at downstream of the starter dam, it is suggested that the measures of draining at the deep part of dam body (such as horizontal drainage pipes, radial well, etc) shall be taken to bring down the free face of the dam, resulting in the dam with an improved stability. Thus those safety event including seepage and failure of the dam, even more serious dam breaks can be effectively prevented.
Keywords:Geo-studio  tailings dam  seepage  phreatic line  dynamic response  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《矿冶工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《矿冶工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号