| 从科学史角度解释科学发现优先权争论的两个案例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡海山.从科学史角度解释科学发现优先权争论的两个案例[J].兰州工业高等专科学校学报,2009,16(2):66-68. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡海山 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 兰州大学,哲学与社会学院,甘肃,兰州,730000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 默顿将科学发现的优先权之争的深层原因归结为科学体制的规范性要求。默顿科学奖励概念的来源是强调知识创新的原创性或独创性，这些是其优点；他有关同行评议的模糊性是其缺点。用科学史的方法对两个例子进行分析，说明处于对立双方的科学家在科学创新过程中的具体作用，显示这一方法的优点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学发现的优先权 科学史 牛顿 莱布尼兹 DNA |
Explain Two Examples of the Priority Disputes of Scientific Discovery in the Methods of History of Science |
| |
| HU Hai-shan.Explain Two Examples of the Priority Disputes of Scientific Discovery in the Methods of History of Science[J].Journal of Lanzhou Higher Polytechnical College,2009,16(2):66-68. |
| |
| Authors: | HU Hai-shan |
| |
| Affiliation: | School of Philosophy and Sociology;Lanzhou University;Lanzhou 730000;China |
| |
| Abstract: | R.K.Merton attributes the deep reasons of priority disputes of scientific discorveries to mormal demand of scienfic system.Merton's concept of scienfic rewards emphasizes originality of knowledge to us.This is its advandge.Its weakness is the fuzziness of peer review.Two examples of scientific discorveris are studied by the way of history of science to explain the function of the scientists in opposite parties in the process of scientific innovation. |
| |
| Keywords: | DNA |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
