首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

北京新机场跑道构型设计方案比较
引用本文:王涛波,高伟. 北京新机场跑道构型设计方案比较[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2014, 23(1): 93-97
作者姓名:王涛波  高伟
作者单位:中国民航大学 空中交通管理基地, 天津 300300;中国民航大学 空中交通管理基地, 天津 300300
摘    要:为满足北京地区快速增长的旅客航空需求, 开展北京新机场建设工作。本期规划机场跑道数量4条, 有“3+1”和“4+0”两种跑道构型备选方案。首先从机场、空管和航空公司三个角度定性分析, 确定跑道构型方案比较的评价指标, 分别是跑道容量、地面滑行时间和航班延误, 再采用数学方法计算两种方案下跑道的理论容量, 最后用Simmod软件对两种方案进行仿真分析。根据评价指标比较仿真结果, 可知“3+1”跑道构型方案较优。同时该结果也可以作为北京新机场跑道构型设计方案比选等相关问题研究的参考。

关 键 词:跑道构型  跑道容量  滑行时间  航班延误
收稿时间:2013-06-13
修稿时间:2013-09-02

Runway Layout Comparison of Beijing New Airport
WANG Tao-Bo and GAO Wei. Runway Layout Comparison of Beijing New Airport[J]. Computer Systems& Applications, 2014, 23(1): 93-97
Authors:WANG Tao-Bo and GAO Wei
Affiliation:College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
Abstract:The Beijing new airport project is developed to satisfy the aviation demand of Beijing area. There are 4 runways in the new airport, as well as two alternative programs in the present period, which are called “3+1” and “4+0” to differentiate. Through macro analysis from airport administration, air traffic control and airlines, the evaluation system for choices of alternative program is established, which includes runway capacity, ground taxing time and delays. Then, the theory runway capacity is estimated. After the analysis of these, this paper builds the separate model based on the Simmod software. The “3+1” program is a better option based on the simulating models and the evaluation system. Besides, the conclusion could give theoretical reference to research for the runway layout comparison of Beijing new airport.
Keywords:runway layout  runway capacity  taxing time  delay
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《计算机系统应用》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《计算机系统应用》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号