Assessment of methods for studying the dissolution of phosphate fertilizers of differing solubility in soil |
| |
Authors: | H J Di R Harrison A S Campbell |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Miss E.L. Hellaby Indigenous Grasslands Research Trust, New Zealand;(2) Present address: ADAS Soil and Water Research Center, Anstey Hall, CB2 2LF Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambs, UK;(3) Department of Soil Science, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand;(4) Present address: Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, 6009 Perth, W.A., Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Relationships between plant response and rates of dissolution of ground (< 150µm) North Carolina phosphate rock (NCPR), NCPR 30% acidulated with phosphoric acid (NCPAPR) and monocalcium phosphate (MCP) were assessed in pot experiments. The three fertilizers were incubated for 1, 50 and 111 days, at the rates of 75, 150 and 750µg P g–1 soil, using two soils with different P-retention capacity. After each period of incubation, four pots were set up from each treatment, and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) was grown in a growth chamber for about six weeks to assess the agronomic effectiveness of the fertilizers. Results in dry matter yield and P uptake showed that immediately following application (1 day incubation), the MCP (solution) was supplying more P to plants than either the NCPR or the NCPAPR applied at the same rate. After 50 and 111 days of incubation, the NCPR and NCPAPR were just as effective in the lower P-retention Tekapo soil. The relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) of the NCPR and NCPAPR compared with MCP was generally poorer in the higher P-retention Craigieburn soil than in the Tekapo soil shortly after application, but improved with time of incubation. Ryegrass responses to the application of the three fertilizers corresponded to the changing trends of exchangeable P in the soils, measured by the isotopic method.Regressions were made between plant P uptake and indices describing the intensity factor (water extractable P), quantity factor (Bray I P, Olsen P, 0.5M NaOH extractable P and isotopic exchangeable P) and the kinetic factor (Fin) of soil P supply to plants in the Tekapo soil. The percentage of variation in plant P uptake explained by individual indices was generally less than 80%, no matter which of the three single variable models, the Mitscherlich, the quadratic or the power function was fitted. However, more than 96% of the variation in plant P uptake in the Tekapo soil could be explained by the power function models involving two variables. The rate of P dissolution (Fin) determined by the isotopic dilution method was included in all the two variable models. The results suggest that assessment of soil P supply to plants should consider the kinetic factor in addition to the intensity and quantity factors, particularly where P fertilizers with differing solubility are applied. |
| |
Keywords: | chemical extraction isotopic exchange monocalcium phosphate partially acidulated phosphate rock phosphate dissolution phosphate rock plant response RAE |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|