首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Probabilistic analysis of consolidation that considers spatial variability using the stochastic response surface method
Affiliation:1. Research Institute for Agriculture & Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Abstract:To obtain more accurate and reasonable results in the analyses of soil consolidation, the spatial variability of the soil properties should be considered. In this study, we analyzed the consolidation by vertical drains for soil improvement considering the spatial variability of the coefficients of consolidation. The coefficients for the variation in the vertical and horizontal coefficients of consolidation in Yeonjongdo, South Korea were evaluated, and the probability density function (PDF) was assumed by the Anderson–Darling goodness-of-fit test. Standard Gaussian random fields were generated based on a Karhunen–Loeve expansion, and then transformed using Hermite polynomials in the random field with the log-Gaussian PDF of the coefficient of consolidation. The average degree of consolidation was subsequently calculated using the finite difference method coupled with log-Gaussian random fields. In addition, the stochastic response surface method (SRSM) was applied for the efficient probabilistic uncertainty propagation. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the input parameters of the random field, and the spatial variability was considered using random variables from the Karhunen–Loeve expansion as the input data for the SRSM. The results indicated that when considering the spatial variability of soil properties, the probability of failure for the target degree of consolidation was smaller when the correlation distance was taken into account than when it was not. Additionally, the probability of failure decreased when the correlation distance decreased. Compared with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) results, the SRSM analysis can achieve results of similar accuracy to those obtained using the MCS analysis with a sample size of 100,000 (numerical runs), and a third-order SRSM expansion with only 333 numerical runs is sufficient for obtaining the probability with errors less than 0.01.
Keywords:Spatial variability  Consolidation  Stochastic response surface method  Monte Carlo simulation  Random field
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号