首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

天然气胺法脱碳吸收反应热实验研究
引用本文:唐建峰,姚宝龙,刘倩玉,花亦怀,桑伟,陈静,许义飞.天然气胺法脱碳吸收反应热实验研究[J].石油学报(石油加工),2022,38(6):1433-1443.
作者姓名:唐建峰  姚宝龙  刘倩玉  花亦怀  桑伟  陈静  许义飞
作者单位:1. 中国石油大学(华东) 储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580; 2. 山东省油气储运安全省级重点实验室,山东 青岛 266580; 3. 中海石油气电集团有限责任公司 技术研发中心,北京 100027; 4. 同圆设计集团股份有限公司青岛分公司,山东 青岛 266580
摘    要:采用自主设计的绝热反应量热仪测定了N-甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)、哌嗪(PZ)以及2-氨基-2-甲基-1-丙醇(AMP)在不同条件下吸收CO2的反应热,考察了CO2负载量、总胺质量分数、温度、压力及混合溶液的配比等对吸收反应热的影响。结果表明:MDEA溶液的反应热明显低于PZ和AMP,其反应热范围为50~55 kJ/(mol CO2),而PZ和AMP的反应热范围为65~70 kJ/(mol CO2);各影响因素对反应热变化规律影响程度不同,其中醇胺种类影响最大,其次为CO2负载量。在MDEA溶液中添加PZ或AMP构成的二元复配胺液,其反应热相比于MDEA溶液分别提高了5~10、10~12 kJ/(mol CO2)。在二元复配胺液38%MDEA+2%PZ基础上,分别加入AMP、乙醇胺(MEA)、二乙醇胺(DEA)以及三乙胺(TEA)构成的三元复配胺液中,加入MEA和DEA后反应热升高较为明显,分别达到了78和73 kJ/(mol CO2),加入TEA后反应热有所降低,而加入AMP后反应热基本保持不变。

关 键 词:脱碳  吸收热  N-甲基二乙醇胺  哌嗪  2-氨基-2-甲基-1-丙醇  
收稿时间:2021-07-05

Experimental Study on Absorption Reaction Heat for Natural Gas Decarbonization by Amine Method
TANG Jianfeng,YAO Baolong,LIU Qianyu,HUA Yihuai,SANG Wei,CHEN Jing,XU Yifei.Experimental Study on Absorption Reaction Heat for Natural Gas Decarbonization by Amine Method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section),2022,38(6):1433-1443.
Authors:TANG Jianfeng  YAO Baolong  LIU Qianyu  HUA Yihuai  SANG Wei  CHEN Jing  XU Yifei
Affiliation:1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China;2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Safety, Qingdao 266580, China;3. CNOO Gas & Power Group Research & Development Center, Beijing 100027, China;4. Tong Yuan Design Group Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266580, China
Abstract:This paper uses a self-designed adiabatic reaction calorimeter to determine the reaction heat of CO2 absorption by N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), piperazine (PZ) and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) under different conditions, and explores the effects of CO2 loading, total amine mass fraction, temperature, pressure and the ratio of mixed solution on the absorption reaction heat. The results show that the reaction heat of MDEA solution is obviously lower than that of PZ and AMP solution, ranging from 50—55 kJ/(mol CO2), while that of PZ and AMP is within the range of 65—70 kJ/(mol CO2). It thus can be seen that various factors have different influences on the change law of reaction heat, among which the type of alcohol amine is the primary influencing factor, followed by CO2 loading. The reaction heat of binary compound amine solution with PZ or AMP as additive is increased separately by 5—10 kJ/(mol CO2) and 10—12 kJ/(mol CO2) as compared with that of MDEA solution. On the basis of binary compound amine solution (38%MDEA+2%PZ), the reaction heat of the ternary compound amine solution prepared by adding AMP, ethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA) and triethylamine (TEA) in the binary compound amine solution (38%MDEA+2%PZ) has a significant rise, reaching 78 and 73 kJ/(mol CO2), respectively. The reaction heat decreased after the addition of TEA, but remains unchanged after the addition of AMP.
Keywords:decarbonization  absorption heat  N-methyldiethanolamine  piperazine  2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol  
点击此处可从《石油学报(石油加工)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《石油学报(石油加工)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号