首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

脉冲强光与紫外辐照对鲜食玉米贮藏品质的影响
引用本文:何余堂, 宋珊珊, 解玉梅, 朱力杰, 王胜男, 刘贺, 马涛. 脉冲强光与紫外辐照对鲜食玉米贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, (02): 324-327. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.02.054
作者姓名:何余堂  宋珊珊  解玉梅  朱力杰  王胜男  刘贺  马涛
作者单位:1.渤海大学食品科学与工程学院,生鲜农产品贮藏加工及安全控制技术国家地方联合工程研究中心
摘    要:鲜食玉米贮藏期间品质会下降。以脉冲强光(PL)与紫外辐照(UVR)对鲜食玉米进行保鲜,分析含水量、质量损失率、TPA指标、色差与感官品质,研究贮藏期间品质变化。结果表明,PL、UVR的水分含量显著(p=0.012)、极显著(p=0.003)高于对照,说明可有效抑制水分散失,而PL与UVR无显著差异。在质量损失率上,PL显著低于对照(p=0.018),UVR极显著低于对照(p=0.010),PL显著低于UVR(p=0.035),说明PL、UVR有助于降低玉米质量损失。PL处理的鲜食玉米内聚性极显著高于UVR(p=0.0002)和对照(p=0.0019),UVR与对照无明显差异;在硬度、胶粘性和咀嚼性上,PL与UVR均极显著高于对照(硬度:p=0.0011,p=0.0024;胶粘性:p=0.0004,p=0.0063;咀嚼性:p=0.0003,p=0.0019),PL极显著高于UVR(硬度:p=0.0003;胶粘性:p=0.0005;咀嚼性:p=0.0002),说明PL与UVR会导致籽粒硬度增大,胶粘性和咀嚼性增加。PL、UVR、对照三者间在色差上无显著差异;鲜食玉米贮藏10 d时,PL感官评分为84.4,UVR为80.6,对照为73.2。PL感官品质极显著优于UVR和对照(p=0.005,p=0.002),UVR也极显著优于对照(p=0.002),说明PL对鲜食玉米保鲜效果较好,能更好保持色、香、味等感官品质。 

关 键 词:脉冲强光  紫外辐照  鲜食玉米  保鲜品质
收稿时间:2016-07-06

Effects of pulsed light and UV irradiation on fresh corn quality during storage period
HE Yu-tang, SONG Shan-shan, XIE Yu-mei, ZHU Li-jie, WANG Sheng-nan, LIU He, MA Tao. Effects of pulsed light and UV irradiation on fresh corn quality during storage period[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (02): 324-327. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.02.054
Authors:HE Yu-tang  SONG Shan-shan  XIE Yu-mei  ZHU Li-jie  WANG Sheng-nan  LIU He  MA Tao
Affiliation:1.College of Food Science and Technology,Bohai University,National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Storage,Processing and Safety Control Technology for Fresh Agricultural and Aquatic Products
Abstract:Fresh corn quality declined during storage. The pulsed light( PL) and UV irradiation( UVR) treatment were used to preserve fresh corn to analyze the moisture content,weight loss rate,TPA index,odors,color difference and sensory quality in order to research quality changes of fresh corn during storage.The results showed that moisture content of PL and UVR were higher significantly( p = 0.012) and extremely significantly( p = 0.003) than the control exhibiting that PL and UVR could effectively inhibit moisture loss of fresh corn,but without significant difference between PL and UVR.In weight loss rate,PL was lower significantly than control( p = 0.018),UVR was lower extremely significantly( p = 0.010) than control and PL was lower significantly( p = 0.035) than UVR,which showing PL and UVR were helpful to reduce the weight loss of fresh corn. PL was higher extremely significantly than UVR( p = 0.0002) and control( p = 0.0019) in corn cohesiveness while there was no significant difference between UVR and control. PL and UVR were extremely significantly higher than control( hardness: p =0.0011,p = 0.0024,gumminess: p = 0.0004,p = 0.0063,chewiness: p = 0.0003,p = 0.0019) and also PL were extremely significantly higher than UVR( hardness: p = 0.0003,gumminess: p = 0.0005,chewiness: p = 0.0002) in hardness,gumminess and chewiness.It displayed that PL and UVR could raise corn kernel hardness and increase gumminess and chewiness. There were no significant differences in color difference among PL,UVR and control. The sensory evaluation score of PL was 84.4,UVR was 80.6 and the control was 73.2 when fresh corn storage 10 d. The sensory quality of PL was extremely significantly better than UVR( p = 0.005) and control( p = 0.002),and the sensory quality of UVR was extremely significantly better than control( p = 0.002).The effects of PL on fresh corn were better and could better maintain sensory qualities such as color,odor and taste.
Keywords:pulsed light  UV irradiation  fresh corn  preservation quality
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号