首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种软基沉降预测方法的应用及对比分析
引用本文:闫飞亚,陈志波.两种软基沉降预测方法的应用及对比分析[J].长江科学院院报,2016,33(1):106-110.
作者姓名:闫飞亚  陈志波
作者单位:福州大学 环境与资源学院, 福州 350116
基金项目:国家自然科学基金,福州大学科技发展基金
摘    要:运用沉降预测方法中的双曲线法、指数曲线法对堆载预压处理的某道路软土地基进行沉降预测,并研究了初始时间起点、采用数据时间长短、时间间隔对2种方法推算精度的影响。研究表明初始时间起点对双曲线法的推算精度影响较大,对指数曲线法的推算精度影响较小;采用数据时间的长短对2种方法的影响精度都很大,采用较长时间的沉降资料,能提高推算精度;时间间隔对2种方法的影响都较小。

关 键 词:软土地基  沉降预测  堆载预压  双曲线法  指数曲线法  
收稿时间:2014-05-27

Application and Comparison of Two Methods of Settlement Prediction for Foundation in Soil
YAN Fei-ya,CHEN Zhi-bo.Application and Comparison of Two Methods of Settlement Prediction for Foundation in Soil[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2016,33(1):106-110.
Authors:YAN Fei-ya  CHEN Zhi-bo
Affiliation:School of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
Abstract:Based on methods such as hyperbolic method and exponential curve method, we carried out settlement prediction for soft-soil foundation of a highway, which was treated by surcharge preloading. Influences of starting time, time length from the moment of full loading and time interval were studied for the two methods above. Results show that, as for prediction accuracy, hyperbolic method is more influenced by starting time than exponential curve method. Then, time length from the moment of full loading has great influence on the two methods, and prediction accuracy can be improved with the increase of time length. Finally, two methods are less affected by time interval.
Keywords:foundation in soft soil  settlement prediction  surcharge preloading  hyperbolic method  exponential curve method
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江科学院院报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江科学院院报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号