Modelling net primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems in East Asia based on an improved CASA ecosystem model |
| |
| Authors: | Deyong Yu Peijun Shi Hongbo Shao Wenquan Zhu Yaozhong Pan |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Natural Disaster, MOE/Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University , Beijing, 100875, China dyyucas@163.com;3. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Natural Disaster, MOE/Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University , Beijing, 100875, China;4. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Yangling, 712100, China;5. Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research for Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) , Yantai, 264003, China;6. Institute of Life Sciences, Qingdao University of Science and Technology , Qingdao, 266042, China |
| |
| Abstract: | By using a land cover map, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data sets, monthly meteorological data and observed net primary productivity (NPP) data, we have improved the method of estimating light use efficiency (LUE) for different biomes and soil moisture coefficients in the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) ecosystem model. Based on this improved model we produced an annual NPP map (in 1999) for the East Asia region located at 10–70° N, 70–170° E (about 19.66% of the terrestrial surface of the Earth). The results show that the mean NPP for the study area in 1999 was 374.12 g carbon (C) m?2 year?1 and the total NPP was 1.096 × 1014 kg C year?1, making up 17.51–18.39% of the global NPP. Comparison between the estimated NPP obtained from this improved CASA ecosystem model and the observed NPP obtained from two NPP databases indicates that the estimated NPP is close to the observed NPP, with an average error of 5.15% for the study region. We used two different land cover maps of China to drive the improved CASA model by keeping other inputs unchanged to determine how the classification accuracy of the land cover map affects the estimated NPP, and the results indicate that an accurate land cover map is important for obtaining an accurate and reliable estimate of NPP for some regions, especially for a particular biome. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
