Estimating crop chlorophyll content with hyperspectral vegetation indices and the hybrid inversion method |
| |
Authors: | Liang Liang Liping Di Chao Zhang Meixia Deng |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, P.R. China;2. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, P.R. China;3. Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USAliang_rs@jsnu.edu.cn qinzh@caas.net.cn zhaosh@nju.edu.cn;5. Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA;6. College of Information &7. Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China |
| |
Abstract: | A hybrid inversion method was developed to estimate the leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) of crops. Fifty hyperspectral vegetation indices (VIs), such as the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and canopy chlorophyll index (CCI), were compared to identify the appropriate VIs for crop LCC and CCC inversion. The hybrid inversion models were then generated from different modelling methods, including the curve-fitting and least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR) and random forest regression (RFR) algorithms, by using simulated Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) datasets that were generated by a radiative transfer model. Finally, the remote-sensing mapping of a CHRIS image was completed to test the inversion accuracy. The results showed that the remote-sensing mapping of the CHRIS image yielded an accuracy of R2 = 0.77 and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) = 17.34% for the CCC inversion, and an accuracy of only R2 = 0.33 and NRMSE = 26.03% for LCC inversion, which indicates that the remote-sensing technique was more appropriate for obtaining chlorophyll content at the canopy scale (CCC) than at the leaf scale (LCC). The estimated results of various VIs and algorithms suggested that the PRI and CCI were the optimal VIs for LCC and CCC inversion, respectively, and RFR was the optimal method for modelling. |
| |
Keywords: | hyperspectra chlorophyll content inversion PROSAIL random forest regression (RFR) |
|
|