首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

离子色谱法、电位滴定法和直接滴定法对循环水中氯离子的测定对比及应用
引用本文:赵晶晶,张海涛,吴莉莉.离子色谱法、电位滴定法和直接滴定法对循环水中氯离子的测定对比及应用[J].大氮肥,2014(3):205-207,210.
作者姓名:赵晶晶  张海涛  吴莉莉
作者单位:中海石油化学股份有限公司,海南东方572600
摘    要:对常用于C1-检测的方法——离子色谱法、电位滴定法和直接滴定法进行分析比较,发现离子色谱法的结果较好,相对误差和相对标准偏差分别为-1.83%和0.05%,加标回收率为105.1%~109.8%.将该方法应用到循环水中的5种阴离子Cl^-、NO2^-、NO3^-、PO4^3-、SO4^2-的分析中,加标回收率分别为107.2%、102.0%、97.7%、97.0%和100.3%,完全满足工业分析的需求.

关 键 词:Cl^-  循环水  测定  离子色谱法

DETERMINATION OF Cl^-IN CIRCULATING WATER BY ION CHROMATOGRAPHY,POTENTIOMETRIC TITRATION AND DIRECT TITRATION METHOD
Zhao Jingjing,Zhang Haitao,Wu Lili.DETERMINATION OF Cl^-IN CIRCULATING WATER BY ION CHROMATOGRAPHY,POTENTIOMETRIC TITRATION AND DIRECT TITRATION METHOD[J].Large Scale Nitrogenous Fertilizer Industry,2014(3):205-207,210.
Authors:Zhao Jingjing  Zhang Haitao  Wu Lili
Affiliation:(China Blue Chemical Ltd., Donffang 572600)
Abstract:Three kinds of Cl^- determination methods: ion chromatography, potentiometrie titration and direct titration method were studied. The result shows that ion chromatography is better than others, the relative error and RSD are -1.83% and 0.05% respectively, and the recovery can reach to 105.1%~109.8%. Using ion chromatography to determine five kinds of anion ( Cl^-, NO2^-, NO3^-, PO4^3-, SO4^2-), the recoveries are 107.2%, 102.0%, 97.7%, 97.0% and 100.3% respectively, which can fully meet the needs of industrial analysis.
Keywords:Cl^-  circulating water  determination  ion chromatography
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号