Trial spacing and trial distribution effects in Pavlovian conditioning: Contributions of a comparator mechanism.

Two experiments, involving a total of 144 rats, investigated a potential basis for trial spacing and trial distribution effects. In Exp 1, a CS (e.g., CS A) was trained with either massed (e.g., A?→?A?→?A) or spaced (e.g., A A A) trials. When trials were massed, brief exposure to the training context (a condition typical of massed training) impaired responding, whereas more extensive exposure to the context during or after training reduced this apparent massed trials deficit. In Exp 2, different CSs were trained in either a massed (e.g., A?→?A?→?A?→?B?→?B?→?B?→?C?→?C?→?C) or a distributed (e.g., A?→?B?→?C?→?A?→?B?→?C, etc.) manner. Trials massed in this sense resulted in impaired responding to the CS, and this impairment was attenuated by posttraining extinction of the context cues. Thus, trial distribution and apparent trial spacing effects were, at least in part, reversible deficits in performance rather than failures of learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)