首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

特低渗透储层测井系列优化评价研究——以HQ地区特低渗透储层测井系列评价效果分析为例
引用本文:孙宝佃,宋子齐,成志刚,景成,何羽飞,张亮,段琼,李淼.特低渗透储层测井系列优化评价研究——以HQ地区特低渗透储层测井系列评价效果分析为例[J].石油地球物理勘探,2012(3):483-490,359,518.
作者姓名:孙宝佃  宋子齐  成志刚  景成  何羽飞  张亮  段琼  李淼
作者单位:中国石油集团测井有限公司油气评价中心;西安石油大学石油工程学院;中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院
基金项目:中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与开发项目“致密气藏测井釆集处理与评价技术研究”(编号2010E-2304);国家自然科学基金项目(编号51104119)资助
摘    要:长庆油田HQ地区长6储层属于低孔、特低渗、复杂岩性、复杂孔隙结构储层,其烃类所占岩层体积比例不足8%,油气储层测井响应十分复杂。本文利用特低渗储层类型识别、储渗特征和含油气性质分析,对11种常规测井方法进行了优化评价研究。通过统计分析区内100多口井的目的层段1000多个不同类型油气储层测井评价效果,有效地阐明了特低渗透储层勘探开发中不同系列测井方法的作用和效果,通过加强测井系列采集和资料深化研究,提出了在特低渗透油田中选择测井技术系列的原则。其中岩性系列以自然电位测井效果为好,井径和有效光电吸收截面测井居中,自然伽马测井较差;孔隙度系列以密度测井效果为好,中子孔隙度测井居中,声波时差测井较差;电阻率系列以阵列感应测井效果为好,俄罗斯感应测井居中,双感应及微电极系测井较差。

关 键 词:特低渗透储层  岩性、孔隙度、电阻率测井系列  实用效果  经济实用测井系列  优化评价

Ultra-low permeability reservoir logging series evaluation in HQ area
Sun Baodian,Song Ziqi,Cheng Zhigang,Jing Cheng,He Yufei,Zhang Liang,Duan Qiong,and Li Miao.Ultra-low permeability reservoir logging series evaluation in HQ area[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2012(3):483-490,359,518.
Authors:Sun Baodian  Song Ziqi  Cheng Zhigang  Jing Cheng  He Yufei  Zhang Liang  Duan Qiong  and Li Miao
Affiliation:1.Oil and Gas Evaluation Center,CNPC Logging Co.Ltd.,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710077,China2.College of Petroleum Engineering,Xi’an Shiyou University,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710065,China3.College of Petroleum Engineering,China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao,Shandong 266555,China
Abstract:The reservoir Chang 6 in HQ area is characterized by low porosity,low permeability,complex lithology,and pore structure.This makes logging response very complicated.Hydrocarbon in the reservoir is less than 8% of the rock volume.Using ultra-low permeability identification and permeability characteristics analysis,our study focuses on the optimization evaluation of 11 types of logging.After statistical analysis of logging responses of more than 1000 reservoirs in 100 wells,we divide these 11 types of logging into 3 kinds of responses,good,normal or poor response.The statistical analysis shows that the different logging methods have different functions and effects.In lithology logging series,the best one is SP logging,CAL and Pe logging are normal,and GR logging is a poor one.In porosity logging series,the best one is DEN logging,then CNL,and the last one is AC.In resistivity logging series,array induction logging is the best,Russian induction logging is normal,and dual induction logging & micro-electrodes are poor.
Keywords:ultra-low permeability reservoir  lithology-porosity-resistivity logging series  practical effect  economical and practical logging series  optimization evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号