Abstract: | Previous research has supported E. Erikson's (1968) theoretical proposition that advanced identity formation is associated with greater interpersonal intimacy. However, these studies have been criticized for using cross-sectional methods and/or male Ss exclusively. In this study, 28 male and 50 female undergraduates were randomly selected as participants in a 1-yr longitudinal project to assess the identity–intimacy relationship. An ego-identity interview and an intimacy interview were administered to measure Ss' statuses on the 2 psychosocial constructs. Data indicate that identity formation maintained a trend for time-lagged and concurrent associations with intimacy development. Occupational identity for males and religious identity for females were the most salient factors contributing to advanced intimacy status. The importance of sex differences in determining the specificity of the identity–intimacy relationship is discussed. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |