首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

梁单元与壳单元在固有振动计算中的比较
引用本文:田金梅. 梁单元与壳单元在固有振动计算中的比较[J]. 核动力工程, 2008, 29(1): 50-52,80
作者姓名:田金梅
作者单位:北京核工程研究设计院,北京,100840
摘    要:分别采用ANSYS中的beam188单元和shell63单元对圆筒形结构进行有限元建模,利用APDL语言编制了程序,计算了长径比为4~20的圆筒形结构的自由振动特性,对固有频率和模态进行了分析.结果表明,对于长径比>10的筒形结构,采用ANSYS中以Timoshenko梁为基础的单元基本可以满足要求;对于长径比<6的筒形结构,需根据工程实际,采用更接近结构实际情况的单元(如壳单元或体单元)建立模型,以提高计算结果的准确性.

关 键 词:圆筒形结构  梁单元  壳单元  模态分析  单元选择
文章编号:0258-0926(2008)01-0050-04
收稿时间:2007-01-10
修稿时间:2007-06-11

Comparison of Beam Element and Shell Element in Analyzing Inherent Vibration of Structures
TIAN Jin-mei. Comparison of Beam Element and Shell Element in Analyzing Inherent Vibration of Structures[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2008, 29(1): 50-52,80
Authors:TIAN Jin-mei
Abstract:Finite element models of tube structures are set up using ANSYS with beam 188 element and shell63 element respectively.The computing programs are written by means of APDL language,the free vi-bration characteristics of tube structures with length-to-diameter ratios of 4~20 are computed.Also,the cor-responding inherent frequencies and modes are analyzed.The results show that as to tube structures with length-to-diameter larger than 10,the beam element of ANSYS based on Timoshenko beam can meet our re-quirements;but as to tube structures with length-to-diameter smaller than 6,in order to improve the accuracy,elements which are more close to real structures such as shell element or solid element should be used ac-cording to practical engineering.
Keywords:Tube structure  Beam element  Shell element  Modal analysis  Element choosing
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号