首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于不同微观固体接触模型的轮轨表面变形特性分析
引用本文:吴涛,吴兵,温泽峰,金学松.基于不同微观固体接触模型的轮轨表面变形特性分析[J].机械工程学报,2017,53(22):134-142.
作者姓名:吴涛  吴兵  温泽峰  金学松
作者单位:1. 西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室 成都 610031;2. 苏州大学城市轨道交通学院 苏州 215131
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51605318)、中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划(2016G008-C)和江苏省高校自然科学基金(16KJB580008)资助项目。
摘    要:针对轮轨表面接触变形问题,采用不同的统计型微观固体接触模型,即Greenwood-Williamson (GW)模型,Chang-Etsion-Bogy (CEB)模型和Zhao-Maietta-Chang (ZMC)模型,研究轮轨接触表面变形特性。利用Newton-Raphson方法对微观固体接触模型公式进行求解,并同时求解间隙方程和载荷平衡方程。考虑不同粗糙度和不同塑性指数下各微观固体接触模型的压力分布情况,以及接触半径随载荷的变化情况。并将不同微观固体接触模型的结果和Hertz模型结果对比,结果表明弹塑性微观接触模型(CEB,ZMC)比弹性模型(GW)有着更小的接触压力以及更宽的接触半径,最大压力均小于最大Hertz接触压力,接触半径均大于Hertz接触半径。

关 键 词:Newton-Raphson方法  粗糙度  接触半径  接触压力  轮轨接触  微观固体接触模型  
收稿时间:2016-10-31

Analysis of the Wheel/rail Surfaces Deformation Characteristics Based on Different Micro-contact Models
WU Tao,WU Bing,WEN Zefeng,JIN Xuesong.Analysis of the Wheel/rail Surfaces Deformation Characteristics Based on Different Micro-contact Models[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2017,53(22):134-142.
Authors:WU Tao  WU Bing  WEN Zefeng  JIN Xuesong
Affiliation:1. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;2. School of Urban Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou 215131
Abstract:In view of the wheel/rail contact surfaces deformation, based on the different statistical micro-contact models including Greenwood-Williamson(GW) model, Chang-Etsion-Bogy (CEB) model and Zhao-Maietta-Chang (ZMC) model, a wheel/rail line-contact model under dry condition is used to predict the characteristics of the wheel/rail surfaces deformation of different micro-contact models. And the formulas of micro-contact models are solved by using the Newton-Raphson method, separation formulas and force balance equation simultaneously, which obtains the pressure distribution and the contact width of different micro-contact models under the different roughness and plasticity index. Comparison of the different contact models shows that the use of elastic-plastic micro-contact models (CEB, ZMC) predict a lower maximum normal pressure and a greater contact width to the elastic model (GW). The max contact pressure of the three models is smaller than max Hertz contact pressure and the contact width is a wider range.
Keywords:contact pressure  contact width  micro-contact model  Newton-Raphson method  roughness  the wheel/rail contact  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《机械工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《机械工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号