Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a case for their use

The information on which this article is based comprises a small fraction of the large database compiled from the DICRG study. These results represent the early performance for HA implants (up to 36 months). The study has been ongoing for 6 years, and there are more than 2,000 implants with 4-year data and 1,500 with 5-year data. These data are similar to the 36-month data, and when they are eventually released, they are likely to reinforce the results reported here. Meanwhile, the evidence presented in this article, along with other corroborating studies cited in the introduction, are sufficient grounds to reach the following conclusion: The ideal implant design and material is one that is easy to use, requires average skills, involves minimal bone trauma, presents a biocompatible contact surface, and produces a high rate of survival in most patients. Based on 36-month survival in the DICRG study, HA-coated implants appeared to satisfy these basic requirements better than the other implants used in the study. HA-coated implants were placed in the most challenging bone types and jaw region, in patients with compromised medical histories, by dentists with different training, skills, and experience, under less than ideal clinical conditions, and still showed the highest survival rates of all implants at every point in the treatment up to 36 months.