A rejoinder to "Psychotherapy research ethics: Continuing the debate on controlled clinical trials." |
| |
| Authors: | Imber, Stanley D. Glanz, Lawrence M. Elkin, Irene Sotsky, Stuart M. Boyer, Jenny L. Leber, William R. |
| |
| Abstract: | Responds to C. A. Heflinger's (1987) critique of the present authors (1986) by reiterating their concern for the principle of autonomy. The present authors note that all patients were fully informed about the research plan and their right to withdraw. Nonetheless, the ethical criticism offered by Heflinger regarding randomization cannot be entirely dismissed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
