| 线路软土地基沉降预测方法分析对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴军.线路软土地基沉降预测方法分析对比[J].山西建筑,2007,33(28):116-117. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东电网公司茂名高州供电局,广东,茂名,525200 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对软土地基沉降常用的计算方法进行了综述,并用规范中的两种曲线拟合方法及BP人工神经网络法进行分析与预测,从各种拟合预测曲线及实测曲线的比较中可以看出,BP人工神经网络法能够更加准确地对软土地基沉降进行预测,且人为因素较少,比较符合客观实际,为软土沉降预测方法的选用提供参考.
|
| 关 键 词： | 软土地基 三点法 双曲线法 BP神经网络 沉降分析比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-6825（2007）28-0116-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-05-26 |
Analysis and comparison of route soft soil base sinking prospecting mathods |
| |
| WU Jun.Analysis and comparison of route soft soil base sinking prospecting mathods[J].Shanxi Architecture,2007,33(28):116-117. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Jun |
| |
| Abstract: | It narrates common calculating methods of soft base sinking, makes analysis ans comparison on two curves combining method and BP artificial nerve net method. From the comparison between each combining prospect curves and actual curves, we can see that BP artificial nerve net method can do more accurate observation on soft base sinking, and have less contrived factors which is more suitable to the fact, and offers reference for soft base sinking observation methods. |
| |
| Keywords: | soil base three-fold method double curve method BP artificial nerve net sinking analysis and comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
