The evaluation system for design alternatives in collaborative design |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Architecture and Building Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK;2. Department of Architecture, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA;3. Department of Environmental Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan;1. Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada;2. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;1. Institut des sciences de la mer de Rimouski (ISMER), Canada Research Chair in Marine Geology & GEOTOP, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 310 allée des Ursulines, Rimouski QC G5L 3A1, Canada;2. Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Risø Campus, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark;3. Centre for Nuclear Technologies, Technical University of Denmark, Risø Campus, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark;4. Département de biologie, chimie et géographie, Research Chair in Coastal Geoscience & Centre d’études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 300 allée des Ursulines, Rimouski QC G5L 3A1, Canada;1. School of Computer Science and Technology, USTC, China;2. Suzhou Institute for Advanced Study, USTC, China;3. School of Computer Science, Yancheng Teachers University, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The evaluation of design alternatives is an important phase for supporting design decision and for producing new design concepts, and it is repeatedly processed. To proceed with the design process in standard, the repetition is reduced to minimum, and design must be optimized in limited cost and time. For smooth and fast process, lots of design alternatives are provided within the limit of possibility and they must be evaluated appropriately. It's possible to evaluate design alternatives using various media. This paper describes the characteristics of various media that have been used for evaluation of design alternatives, and propose the evaluation system for design alternatives based on the findings of case studies. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
