Disseminated intravascular coagulation. Objective criteria for diagnosis and management

Current concepts of the cause, pathophysiology, clinical and laboratory diagnosis, and management of fulminant and low-grade DIC have been presented. Considerable attention has been devoted to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding these pathophysiological interrelationships can the clinician and laboratory scientist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC. In this discussion, objective clinical and laboratory criteria for a diagnosis of DIC have been delineated, thus eradicating unnecessary confusion and empirical decisions regarding the diagnosis. Many therapeutic decisions to be made are controversial and will remain so until more is published about specific therapeutic modalities and survival patterns. Also, therapy must be highly individualized depending on the nature of DIC, age, cause of DIC, site and severity of hemorrhage or thrombosis, and hemodynamic and other clinical parameters. Also presented are clear criteria for severity of DIC and objective criteria for defining a response to therapy. Also, because it is often difficult for the individual physician to decide when to stop often extensive therapy, objective criteria whereby therapy may be stopped, as continuation is likely fruitless, have been presented as a guideline. Lastly, it should be appreciated that many syndromes that are often organ specific share common pathophysiology with DIC but are typically identified as an independent disease entity, such as hemolytic uremic syndrome, adult shock lung syndrome, eclampsia, and many other isolated organ-specific disorders.