首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基体匹配法和内标法-电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱测定铸造锌合金中高含量铝和铜光谱干扰校正的比较
引用本文:胡璇,李跃平,石磊. 基体匹配法和内标法-电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱测定铸造锌合金中高含量铝和铜光谱干扰校正的比较[J]. 冶金分析, 2014, 34(4): 17-20. DOI: 10.13228/j.issn.1000-7571.2014.04.004
作者姓名:胡璇  李跃平  石磊
作者单位:中国铝业股份有限公司郑州研究院, 河南郑州 450041
摘    要:从铸造锌合金中铝和铜含量的测定准确度、精密度和回收率方面, 比较了用基体匹配法和内标法校正电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱(ICP-AES)法测定铸造锌合金中高含量铝和铜的光谱干扰效果。结果表明:基体匹配法在测定铸造锌合金中铝的相对误差小于0.4%, 较内标法低, 回收率稳定在105%~108%之间;内标法测定铝和铜时的相对标准偏差在0.2%~0.5%之间, 明显低于基体匹配法, 其中以钪(Sc)作为内标元素测定铜的准确度、精密度和回收率均较高, 而以Y作为内标元素测定铝的效果较好。

关 键 词:电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法(ICP-AES)  锌合金  光谱干扰  校正  基体匹配法  内标法      
收稿时间:2013-06-21

Comparison on the spectral interference correction in the determination of high content aluminum and copper in casting zinc alloy by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry with matrix matching method and internal standard method
HU Xuan,LI Yue-ping,SHI Lei. Comparison on the spectral interference correction in the determination of high content aluminum and copper in casting zinc alloy by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry with matrix matching method and internal standard method[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2014, 34(4): 17-20. DOI: 10.13228/j.issn.1000-7571.2014.04.004
Authors:HU Xuan  LI Yue-ping  SHI Lei
Affiliation:Zhengzhou Research Institute of CHALCO, Zhengzhou 450041, China
Abstract:The spectral interference correction in the determination of high content aluminum and copper in casting zinc alloy by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) with matrix matching method and internal standard method was compared from the aspects of accuracy, precision and recovery of the determination of aluminum and copper in casting zinc alloy. The results showed that the relative error of matrix matching method determination of aluminum in casting zinc alloy was less than 0.4%, which was lower than that of internal standard method| the recovery was kept stable between 105%-108%. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the determination of aluminum and copper by internal standard method was between 0.2%-0.5%, obviously lower than that of matrix matching method. The accuracy, precision and recovery of copper with Sc as internal standard element were comparatively higher, and the determination results of aluminum with Y as internal standard element was better.
Keywords:inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry(ICP-AES)   zinc alloy   spectral interference   correction  matrix matching method   internal standard method   aluminum   copper
点击此处可从《冶金分析》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《冶金分析》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号