Accurate stress intensity factor solutions for corner cracks at a hole |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Engineering Mechanics, United States Air Force Academy, USAF Academy, Colorado 80840, USA;2. Aeronautics Division, Swedish Defense Research Agency, Box 110 21, SE-161 11 Bromma, Sweden;1. CMLA, ENS Cachan, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 94235 Cachan, France;2. Laboratoire de Mathématiques d’Orsay, CNRS UMR8628, Université Paris-Sud, Bât. 425, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France;1. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
| |
Abstract: | Laboratory test and in-service experience shows fatigue cracks at holes exhibit unsymmetric growth; thus, the need for the new solutions is paramount. Stress intensity factor, K, solutions for symmetric and unsymmetric corner cracks at a hole subject to general loading were determined using a hp-version of the finite element method (FEM) in conjunction with a mathematical splitting scheme to enable efficient, accurate calculations. In traditional applications of the FEM, mesh generation is labor intensive; however, using the splitting scheme, stress intensity functions are obtained without explicitly including the crack in the FE mesh of the global structure. By using the hp-version of FEM, a set of K-solutions converging exponentially fast to the exact solution is obtained. The crack is analyzed in the local domain with easily generated FE meshes. All structurally significant crack shapes were considered; specifically, crack depth to crack length ratios (a/c) of 0.1–10.0, crack depth to sheet thickness ratios (a/t) of 0.10–0.99, and hole radius to sheet thickness ratios (r/t)=1.0. The loading conditions were remote tension, remote bending, and pin loading (bearing). In addition, all combinations of a/c and a/t are analyzed at each side of the hole; thus 226,875 solutions were developed with control of the error in the computed K solutions. Calculated relative error is generally much smaller than 1% along the entire crack front including the vertex regions. Comparisons are made to solutions in the open literature. The new K solutions show the literature solutions are, in general, accurate for all three load conditions; however, for the extreme cases of a/c, a/t, and r/t; the literature solutions differ by as much as 26%. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|