Bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia after different surface treatments

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the bond strength of veneering feldspathic porcelain to zirconia. Methods: Fifty yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline specimens were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to various surface treatments. The groups were as follows: Group 1: control group with liner application and no further surface treatment; Group 2: air-particle abrasion with 110 μm of alumina (Al₂O₃) particles; Group 3: grinding with a diamond disk; Group 4: Nd:YAG laser irradiation (the laser and the energy parameters were 10 Hz, and 2 W and 200 mJ, and the pulse duration (short pulse) range was up to 180 μs); Group 5: selective infiltration etching (SIE). After surface treatments, a liner application was performed for all surfaces according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Veneering porcelain was applied on zirconia surfaces using a Teflon mold. Shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. The fractured surface morphologies were examined with scanning electron microscopy. The data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests (α = .05). Results: The Megapascal values of the bonding groups were as follows: G1 = 8.62 ± 1.12, G2 = 13.87 ± 5.08, G3 = 12.31 ± 3.35, G4 = 17.32 ± 6.16, and G5 = 16.17 ± 4.55. Statistically significant differences were observed between the control group and the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 4 had the highest bond strength while G1 showed the lowest bond strength. No significant differences were found between the Nd:YAG, grinding, sandblasting, and SIE groups. Conclusion: Surface treatments had different effects on the shear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to zirconia. Surface treatment techniques used in this study can be used on zirconia specimens prior to liner application to obtain an acceptable bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia. The effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation and SIE techniques on bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia should be evaluated with further studies.     

Effect of thermal cycling and low pressure sandblasting on the bond strength of a self-adhesive cement to Y-TZP zirconia

The aim of this investigation was to assess the influence of several surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a self-adhesive resin cement containing 10-methacryloxydecyl-dihydrogenphosphate monomer to densely sintered zirconia ceramic, before and after thermal cycles. Hundred densely sintered zirconia cylinders were divided into five groups (n = 20). Each of them received a different surface treatment: (1) control [No_T], with the zirconia surface unconditioned, (2) low pressure air abrasion [Sand_S], (50 μm, 1 bar), (3) standardized air abrasion [Sand_H], (50 μm, 2.8 bar), (4) standardized Rocatec? Plus (silica-coated alumina oxide) air abrasion (2.8 bar) and silanization [Roc_H], (5) low pressure Rocatec? Plus (silica-coated alumina oxide) air abrasion (1 bar) and silanization [Roc_S]. Five more surface-treated specimens were addressed to scanning electron microscope for qualitative observations. After specimen fabrication, subgroups of 10 bonded samples were stored in water either for 24 h (T1) or subjected to 5000 thermal cycles (T2); SBSs were determined with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. At T1, mean SBSs (MPa) obtained for the examined groups were: [Sand_H] 16.24 ± 2.95; [Sand_S] 16.01 ± 2.68; [Roc_H] 17.17 ± 1.64; [Roc_S] 15.92 ± 1.99. All surface treatments positively affected (p < 0.05) the initial self-adhesive cement adhesion to zirconia with respect to No_T (13.29 MPa). Artificial aging decreased the bond strength in all test groups significantly, but no spontaneous debonding was observed in [No_T]: at T2, SBS values ranged from 7.76 ± 2.37 (No_T) to 8.89 ± 1.74 (Sand_S), with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.5293). Both air abrasion with alumina oxide and Rocatec? universal bonding system, used with hard or low air pressure, produced comparable effects on cement–zirconia interface before and after thermal cycles. After artificial aging, minimal differences in bond strength values between sandblasted and control groups were not of statistical significance.     

Efficacy of novel cleansing agent for the decontamination of lithium disilicate ceramics: a shear bond strength study

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of Ivoclean as a ceramic cleansing agent, by assessing shear bond strength of pre-etched lithium disilicate (LD) ceramic to resin cement.

Materials and Methods: Seventy LD discs (10 × 10 × 4 mm) were fabricated and etched using 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s. Ten specimens were not exposed to saliva and silicone disclosing medium (negative control). The other 60 specimens, divided into six groups (n = 10), were exposed to saliva for 20 s and silicone disclosing medium for 3 min. Following contamination, 10 specimens were not cleansed (positive control). The remaining five groups were exposed to one of the five different cleansing agents: 96% isopropanol, 37% phosphoric acid-30 s, 5% HF acid- 20 s, 5% HF acid- 120 s, and Ivoclean paste-20 s. All specimens were treated with primer and bonded to a self-curing resin cement. Before shear bond strength testing, all specimens were thermocycled (3000 cycles; 5–55°).

Results: Contamination of pre-etched LD ceramic specimens significantly reduced the shear bond strength values from 22.39 ± 0.38 MPa (negative control) to 6.54 ± 0.90 MPa (positive control) (p < 0.05). Cleansing of contaminated ceramic specimens with 5% HF acid [20 s (19.28 ± 1.06 MPa) and 120 s (20.04 ± 1.09 MPa)] and Ivoclean (18.30 ± 0.97) provided significantly higher bond strength values than other cleansing methods with 37% phosphoric acid and 96% isopropanol (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Ivoclean and 5% HF acid were found to be effective in cleansing of LD ceramic surface by demonstrating maximum increase in shear bond strength values as compared to contaminated LD ceramics.     

Effectiveness of different surface cleaning methods on the shear bond strength of resin cement to contaminated zirconia: an in vitro study

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different surface cleaning methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia ceramic surfaces. Seventy polished and cleaned zirconia disk specimens of 8 mm in diameter and 3.4 mm in thickness were immersed in fresh saliva. They were then pressed into a freshly mixed silicone disclosing medium. Six different cleaning methods were applied to the tested groups; they were airborne-particle abraded (AA), covered with a cleaning paste (Ivoclean®) (IV), etched with orthophosphoric acid (PA), immersed in alcohol (AL), rinsed with tap water only (WA), or cleaned with steam (SC). No surface cleaning was done after saliva immersion and silicone disclosing medium contamination to the control group (CC). The specimens were then bonded to an adhesive resin cement using polyethylene tubes. SBS was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The specimens were also examined with a scanning electron microscope and a stereomicroscope. Group AA yielded the highest SBS value (7.01 ± 1.4 MPa) among the groups, while Group WA had the lowest SBS value (3.03 ± 0.8 MPa). The SBS values of Group AA (7.01 ± 1.4 MPa) and IV (6.2 ± 1.7 MPa) were also significantly higher than those of the remaining four groups (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that among the various cleaning methods tested, airborne-particle abrasion and Ivoclean® paste were effective in cleaning the zirconia surface.     

Effect of experimental primers on hydrolytic stability of resin zirconia bonding

This study assessed the effect of experimental silane primers and two adhesive resin cements on resin zirconia adhesion strength. The surfaces of cut Y-TZP zirconia blocks (Lava? Frame), 16 mm × 16 mm × 4.5 mm, were pretreated twice. First, they were grit-blasted with Korox? alumina powder (110 μm) followed by silica-coating with Rocatec? Soft. Next, the blocks were randomly assigned into eighteen sub-groups (n = 6, N = 108) according to three primers (control ESPE Sil?, 1.0 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, and 1.0 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane + 0.5 vol.-% bis-12-(triethoxysilyl)ethane), two in dentistry used resin cement products (Multilink? Speed, and Multilink? N), and three storage conditions (24 h dry, 1 month immersed in distilled water, and 6 months immersed in distilled water at room temperature) used. Onto each pretreated zirconia block, four cylindrical resin composite cement stubs were prepared and light-cured. The surface roughness, contact angle, and adhesion (shear bond) strength (SBS) were measured, and statistically analyzed (ANOVA, the Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in surface roughness values of different primer-treated zirconia groups. After six months of water aging, the shear bond strength of the groups that employed 1.0 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (9.0 MPa ± 0.8 MPa), and the blend of 1 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane + 0.5 vol.-% bis-12-(triethoxysilyl)ethane (8.9 MPa ± 2.0 MPa) with Multilink? Speed resin composite cement were statistically insignificantly higher compared to using ESPE Sil? (8.7 MPa ± 1.8 MPa). The experimental primers may have potential to be used for long-term resin zirconia adhesion.     

The effect of MDP-based primer on shear bond strength of various cements to two different ceramic materials

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based primer on the shear bond strengths of thermally aged self-adhesive and conventional adhesive resin cements and zinc phosphate cement to zirconia and lithium disilicate substructures. Sixty zirconia (Z) and 60 lithium disilicate (L) disk specimens were cut from ceramic blocks. Each group was divided into six subgroups (n = 10). Half of the specimens of each ceramic group were treated with primer (P) and the other half was remained untreated. Three types of cement were applied: zinc phosphate cement [(ZPC) (Hoffmann Harmonic Shades)]; self-adhesive resin cement [(SAC) (RelyX U200)]; conventional adhesive resin cement [(CAC) (C&B)]. The specimens were subjected to thermal aging procedure for 1 week under 37 °C water bath. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with three-way (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons and interactions between groups were analyzed by using Tukey’s simultaneous confidence intervals. There was no significant difference between the SBS values of SAC-Z (11,47 ± 0,47) and SAC-ZP (11,39 ± 0,42) (p > 0.05). However, the SBS values of SAC-L (12.34 ± 0,55) and SAC-LP (12,50 ± 0,49) were significantly higher than those of SAC-Z and SAC-ZP (p < 0.00). The use of primer significantly increased the SBS value of CAC-ZP (8,05 ± 0,55) when compared to the SBS value of CAC-Z (3,53 ± 0,41) (p < 0.00). Resin cement that contains methacrylate monomers with phosphoric ester functional groups exhibited reliable bond to zirconia. However, the use of an MDP-based primer may not further improve its bond strength.     

Effect of self etching ceramic primer and universal adhesive on bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramic

The clinical success of ceramic restorations is affected by the ceramic bonding procedure. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments, including the use of self-etching ceramic primer (SECP), on resin cement-glass ceramic bond strength. Thirty lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) rectangles (3 mm × 3 mm × 8 mm) were fabricated Specimens were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10) according to the surface treatment: Group 1-hydrofluoric acid [HF acid]+ silane + universal adhesive; Group 2-HF + universal adhesive; Group 3-SECP + universal adhesive. All specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C and shear bond strength (SBS) was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm (Universal Testing machine-Instron). Failure modes were evaluated using a digital microscope for all specimens. Analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc tests using SPSS (Version 22.0, IBM, New York, USA) were used to analyze data. The SBS of groups 1 (19.74 ± 1.28 MPa) and 3 (21.11 ± 2.07 MPa) were significant higher than group 2 (14.80 ± 1.94 MPa). The SBS values for specimens in groups 1 (19.74 ± 1.28 MPa) and 3 (21.11 ± 2.07 MPa) were comparable. Adhesive, mixed and cohesive failure modes were observed and mixed failure was the most common in all groups. Therefore, the use of SECP and universal adhesive is recommended as an alternative to the use of HF acid in combination with ceramic primer while bonding to LDC.     

Shear bond strength of bis-acryl resin provisional material repaired using a flowable composite

This study investigated the shear bond strength of a bis-acryl composite repaired with a flowable composite after different surface treatments. Sixty standardized cylindrical silicone molds were filled with bis-acryl resin provisional material and then divided into six groups (n = 10 per group) to undergo different surface treatments. After a surface treatment had been performed, the flowable composite was injected directly into the cylinder of each specimen, and the specimens were then cured over a 10-mm-thick glass slide for 20 s. The shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min by placing a knife-edged blade immediately adjacent and parallel to the adhesive interface between the repair material (flowable composite) and the bis-acryl resin provisional material. The mean shear bond strengths ranged from 8.98 to 17.14 MPa. The highest mean shear bond strength corresponded to the bonding group (17.14 MPa), whereas the air-particle abrasion group exhibited the lowest mean shear bond strength (8.98 MPa). Surface treatment of bis-acryl resins with bonding appears to be a promising approach for improving repair bond strength, and the bonding group exhibited the highest levels of bond strength.     

A study of compressive strength between zirconia framework and veneering ceramic as a function of thermal expansion coefficient using Shell–Nielsen test method

This study investigated the adhesion between zirconia framework and four veneering ceramic (VC) materials with varying coefficients of thermal expansions (CTE). Zirconia rods (N?=?40) (ICE Zirkon) (diameter: 4 mm, height: 20 mm) were milled and sintered. After firing, the zirconia rods were air-abraded and cleaned. They were randomly assigned to receive four VCs (n?=?10/group), namely (a) Vita VM9 (VZ; 9–9.2?×?10^?6? K^?1), (b) Cerabien ZR (CZ; 9.1?×?10^?6 K^?1), (c) Matchmaker ZR (MM; 9.4?×?10^?6?K^?1), and (d) Ice Zirconia Ceramic (IZ; 9.6?×?10^?6?K^?1). The VCs were then fired onto zirconia rods (height: 2 mm, thickness: 2 mm) circumferentially and were thermocycled for 6000 times (5/55 °C, dwell time: 30?s). Specimens were loaded from the top of the zirconia rods (0.5 mm/min) in a universal testing machine until debonding. Shell–Nielsen bond strength values were calculated (MPa). Failure types were evaluated under SEM. The data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s; α?=?0.05). Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus (m) (0.05) was calculated. The highest mean bond strength (MPa) was obtained for CZ (42.08?±?4.08), followed by VZ (41.77?±?4.92), MM (40.7?±?3.64), and IZ (40.05?±?5.78). While mean bond strength for VZ, MM, and IZ were not significantly different (p?>?0.05), CZ was significantly higher than that of IZ (p?<?0.05). The lowest shape value was for VZ (m?=?16.94) and the highest for MM (m?=?20.16). Mainly, adhesive failures followed by mixed failures were observed. VCs with a greater mismatch of CTE with the zirconia framework exhibited similar Shell–Nielsen bond strength to those with fewer mismatches. CTE mismatch did not affect the results of CZ (9.1?×?10^?6 K^?1) and IZ (9.6?×?10^?6 K^?1).     

Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of different composite resins

This study was aimed to observe the relationship between the different surface treatments and the bond strength of both composite based adhesive cement and zirconia ceramic. Thirty-two zirconia ceramic discs were fabricated by following the instructions of manufacturer (5 × 5 × 1.5 mm). Four subgroups were obtained from the specimens according to the specified surface treatments respectively: (a) C: control groups: no treatment; (b) SB: sandblasting with 125 μm aluminum oxide particles for 10 s; (c) SC: silica coating for 10 s; (d) Nd :YAG laser . The composite resin specimens Panavia F and Clearfil SA were introduced and polymerized to the treated bonding areas. Afterwards the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C during 24 h, and the shear test was applied. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan tests. The bond strength was stated significantly higher in silica coating/Panavia F group (23.35 MPa). The lowest bond strength was stated in control groups cemented with Clearfil SA (12.25 MPa). As a result it was determined that the bond strength has affected the both surface treatments and cement types (p < 0.001). The silica coating –treated zirconia ceramic recorded a significant increase in mean bond strength values.     

Effects of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to zirconia

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cements to zirconia. Material and methods: Sintered zirconia specimens (n = 192) were divided into four different surface treatment groups: control (no treatment); airborne-particle abrasion; glaze layer and hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, and hot etching solution application. Then, each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 12), and three different resin cements were applied to the zirconia surfaces. The shear bond strength value of each specimen was measured after 5000 thermo cycles. The failure types were examined with a stereomicroscope and the effects of the surface treatments were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: The surface treatment and resin cement type significantly affected the bond strength results (p < 0.05). For all resin cements, the airborne-particle abrasion treatment increased the shear bond strength values (p < 0.05). The glaze layer & HF application increased shear bond strength values for all groups, except the Single Bond Universal-RelyX Unicem Aplicap group (p < 0.05). The surface roughness values of airborne-particle abraded specimens were similar to comparable values for specimens from the control group and the hot etching solution group (p > 0.05). The glaze layer & HF application group produced the highest surface roughness values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study recommend using the appropriate combination of surface treatment and adhesive/silane coupling agent to achieve durable zirconia-resin bonding.     

Effect of self-etching ceramic primer on the bond strength of feldspathic porcelain repair

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a self-etching primer on the bond strength of feldspathic porcelain with composite resin. Forty-eight feldspathic porcelain specimens (13 mm × 13 mm × 2 mm) were sectioned from CAD/CAM blocks. Specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 12) as regards to surface treatment method; HF acid etching (HFE), Monobond Etch and Prime (MEP), sandblasting (SB), and MEP + SB. After silane application for group HFE and SB, an adhesive bond was used as a bonding agent in all groups. Composite resin cylinders were build up onto the specimens. Specimens were stored in distilled water, thermocycled 5–55 °C for 5500 cycles, and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test in a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U test (α=.05). Type of failures was evaluated under optical microscopy and surfaces were examined by SEM at ×500 and ×2500 magnifications. There was a significant difference among groups. (p = .019) HF group had the highest mean SBS value (17.54 ± 2.98 MPa) which was significantly higher than other groups (p<.05). Followed by the MEP + SB group (14.68 ± 3.41 MPa), SB group (13.98 ± 3.34 MPa) and MEP group (12.75 ± 2.33 MPa). Nevertheless, the HFE group significantly has higher SBS value than other groups all of the tested surface treatment methods have reached the convenient bond strength values for repair. Although MEP showed clinically acceptable SBS values, further researches with another type of porcelains should be tested.     

A novel silane system as a primer for orthodontic bonding—A pilot study

AimTo determine the adhesion strength (measured as shear bond strength, SBS) of orthodontic brackets using two experimental silane-based primer systems and compare and contrast their effect.Materials and methodsSixty acid-etched premolars were randomly assigned into 4 study groups (n=15). In group 1, brackets were bonded without primer but using Transbond XT adhesive; in group 2, Transbond XT primer was applied and bracket bonded; in group 3, an experimental silane-based primer of 1.0 vol% of 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (ACPS) was applied before bonding; in group 4, an experimental silane-based primer of 1.0 vol% of ACPS+0.5% bis-1, 2-(triethoxysilyl) ethane (BTSE) was used. The adhesion strength (measured as shear bond strength) was recorded using a universal testing machine. Failure types were classified according to the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Contact angles of the primers were measured on an enamel slab.Data was analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc analysis.ResultsThe mean adhesion strength results were high in group 4: 15.8±1.6 MPa followed by group 3: 12.5±1.5 MPa, group 2: 11.9±1.1 MPa and the lowest in group 1: 08.1±0.7 MPa. A significant difference in adhesion strength was observed between all the groups except for group 3 and group 4 (p<0.01).The ARI score was distributed largely to 0 and 1. One instance of enamel fractures was recorded in group 1. The contact angle measurements suggested that the lowest value with the experimental primer containing (ACPS+BTSE) was, <5° followed by Transbond XT, 41.86±4.56°.ConclusionThe experimental silane primer systems were hydrophilic in nature and demonstrated higher adhesion strength compared to traditional orthodontic primers.     

Biaxial flexural strength and Weilbull characteristics of adhesively luted hybrid and reinforced CAD/CAM materials to dentin: effect of self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of the surface treatment and aging on the biaxial flexural strength of ceramic materials cemented to a dentin analogue. One hundred twenty disc-shaped specimens were allocated into 12 groups considering three study factors: ceramic material (lithium disilicate, leucite-based ceramic and hybrid ceramic), surface treatment (10% hydrofluoric acid etching?+?silane or self-etching glass-ceramic primer) and Aging (with 10,000 thermocycles of 5–37–55?°C or without). A tri-layer assembly was designed to mimic a cemented restoration (Variolink N) into a dentin analogue. All samples were submitted to the biaxial flexural strength assay. The flexural strength in MPa was calculated using the finite element method for each sample considering thickness, material properties, and the load to fracture during the in vitro test. Fractographic analysis was also performed. The data was evaluated using three-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α?=?5%). ANOVA showed influence for the Material*Treatment*Aging interaction on the flexural strength (p?=?0.011). The highest strength was calculated for lithium disilicate ceramic?+?self-etching ceramic primer without aging (499?±?17?MPa)^A and the lowest value for hybrid ceramic material?+?acid etching with aging (424?±?48?MPa)^E. According to the Weibull modulus, the most predictable strength was calculated for lithium disilicate?+?acid etching after aging. Acid etching or self-etching ceramic primer promotes similar immediate biaxial flexural strength for each evaluated ceramic. In the long-term, superior strength was observed using acid etching for lithium disilicate and the self-etching ceramic primer for the hybrid ceramic while no difference was observed for leucite-based ceramic.

Clinical implications: Some protocols combining the CAD/CAM ceramic material and the surface treatment could present suitable and stable flexural strength.     

The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different surface pretreatment methods on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) based aesthetic frameworks. Five hundred and forty PEEK disks were fabricated and divided into 6 pretreatment groups (n = 90); (C) untreated control group, (B) airborne-particle abrasion, (S) silica coating, (L) etching with Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser, (LB) etching with Er:YAG laser and airborne-particle abrasion and (LS) etching with Er:YAG laser and silica coating. After topographical surface examinations, specimens were conditioned with adhesive and veneering resin was polymerized onto the PEEK specimens. Twenty-four hours after veneering, specimens were subjected to thermal aging. Afterwards, shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed and the obtained data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of α = .05. Group B (1.58 ± 0.15 μm), Group L (1.79 ± 0.29 μm), Group LB (2.20 ± 0.23 μm) and Group LS (2.31 ± 0.52 μm) demonstrated significantly higher surface roughness (SR) values compared to Group C (1.03 ± 0.11 μm). Group B (10.97 ± 2.88 MPa), Group S (12.07 ± 2.82 MPa), Group LB (12.09 ± 2.08 MPa) and Group LS (13.14 ± 1.45 MPa) demonstrated significantly higher SBS values compared to Group C (6.35 ± 1.21 MPa). Airborne-particle abrasion, silica coating or their combined use with Er:YAG laser system establish durable bond between PEEK and resin; however, only Er:YAG laser treatment has no positive effect on resin-PEEK bond.     

Which is effective on bond strength of resin-based sealers: incorporation of powdered dentin to primer or adhesive?

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adding powdered dentin to primer or adhesive in a self-etch system on the shear bond strength of three resin-based sealers. Seventy-two premolars were sectioned buccolingually, and 144 root halves were divided into three groups according to the sealer used: epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus), methacrylate resin-based (RealSeal, Hybrid Root SEAL) n = 48. The surfaces were irrigated with 5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, distilled water for 5 min. Four subgroups were created (n = 12): control group; Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V treated group; powdered dentin added to the primer of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V (40 wt.%); and powdered dentin added to the adhesive of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V (20 wt.%). Dentin powder was prepared. Three mm high buildups with a constant surface area of 3.45 mm² were created using the sealers and allowed to set (37 ºC, 100% humid, 72 h). The samples were tested to failure for shear bond strength (1 mm/min). The data were calculated (MPa) and analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests. Adhesive use decreased the bonding performance of AH Plus (p = 0.00). Mean bond strength of the other sealers was found similar to control. Primer or adhesive resin with powdered dentin did not increase the adhesive performance of the self-etch system used. The shear bond strength of RealSeal was significantly increased when powdered dentin was added to primer or adhesive (p = 0.00). The effect of adding powdered-dentine to primer or adhesive in a self-etch system on the shear bond strength was sealer-dependent .     

Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of Neo MTA Plus with Biodentine and white ProRoot MTA

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of a new calcium silicate cement, Neo MTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc. Bradenton, FL, U.S.A) by comparing ProRoot MTA and Biodentine.

Material and Methods: Sixty dentin slices were instrumented to achieve a diameter of 1.3 mm. Group 1: white ProRoot MTA, group 2: Biodentine, group 3: Neo MTA Plus – G (powder mixed with gel), group 4: Neo MTA Plus – W (powder mixed with distilled water) were loaded into cavities. The push-out bond strength values were measured. Data were analyzed using Welch ANOVA with Bonferroni correction p = 0.05. Failure modes (adhesive, cohesive, and mixture) were analyzed.

Results: The highest bond strength value was recorded in Neo MTA Plus mixed with gel (5.23 ± 1.78 MPa), whereas white ProRoot MTA (2.57 ± 0.66 MPa) had the lowest. Bond strength values of Neo MTA Plus mixed either with gel or with distilled water were statistically different from both white ProRoot MTA and Biodentine (2.61 ± 0.70 MPa) (p < 0.05). Adhesive failure was predominantly observed in all groups.

Conclusion: Neo MTA Plus could be considered as alternatives to the ProRoot MTA and Biodentine due to its better performance in bonding to root dentin.     

Influence of ceramic thickness and light-curing time on the long-term µTBS of silica-based ceramic to human dentin

To evaluate the influence of ceramic thickness, light-curing time and thermal cycling (TC) on the μTBS of a glass ceramic cemented to human dentin. Ninety-six human molars were embedded in acrylic resin and the occlusal surface was sectioned to exposure dentin. Blocks of feldspathic ceramic (Vita PM9) with different thickness (6 × 6 × 1 mm/2 mm/3 mm) were fabricated with wax pattern and sprue. The blocks and teeth were randomly distributed into 12 groups (n = 8) according to the ceramic thickness (V1: 1 mm, V2: 2 mm and V3: 3 mm), light-curing time (40s; 80s), and TC (yes; no). Dentin was etched, washed and dried. The adhesive (Excite, Ivoclar) was applied onto the dentin surface and light-cured (20s), and the ceramic surface was etched with 10% HF, washed, dried and silanized. The ceramic blocks were cemented to dentin (Variolink II, Ivoclar). The assembly ceramic/dentin was stored in distilled water (37 °C; 24 h) and sectioned in X and Y axes to get the sticks. Half of the samples were submitted to TC while the other half underwent micro-tensile bond testing. The data (MPa) were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Tukey test (5%). ANOVA revealed significant interaction among the factors (p = 0.0001). Tukey test showed significant higher bond strength for the 2 mm group (V280s = 17.0 ± 9.1 MPa) in comparison to the other groups. V340s TC (2.7 ± 6.3 MPa) presented lower bond strength, which was similar to the groups V180s TC (4.6 ± 4.9 MPa) and V240s TC (5.9 ± 4.4 MPa). Light-curing for 80s promoted significant higher bond strength of thicker ceramic (3 mm) than light-curing for 40s.     

Durability of resin bond strength to dental noble metal–ceramic alloys conditioned with novel mercapto silane-based primer systems

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of novel mercapto silane-based experimental primers on the resin bonding and its durability to dental noble metal–ceramic alloys in comparison with that of commercial primers. Disc-shaped gold–platinum–palladium, gold–palladium–silver, and palladium–silver alloy specimens were used as the adherents after air-abrasion. One of three commercial primers (M.L. Primer, Single Bond Universal, and All-Bond Universal) and two experimental primer systems (2-step application with γ-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane and then γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and a blend of the two silanes) was applied to each alloy. Resin cylinders with a diameter of 2.38 mm were bonded to the surfaces and light-cured. All bonded specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 24 h and then half of them additionally water immersed for 7 days (37 °C) and then thermocycled 10,000 times before the shear bond strength test (n = 10). The surface energy parameters for unprimed and primed alloy surfaces were calculated based on the contact angle measurements. The bond strength data were non-parametrically analyzed at α = 0.05. Regardless of the alloy type, both mercapto silane systems equally and consistently showed superior bonding durability to the commercial primers. Pearson correlation analyses revealed moderate to strong, significant correlations between the surface energy parameters and the bond strength values. The two novel mercapto silane systems are a promising alternative for enhanced durability of resin bonding to dental noble metal–ceramic alloys.     

Influence of zirconia surface treatments on resin cement bonding and phase transformation

It evaluated the effects of different zirconia surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to Y-TZP (yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia) ceramics, as well as their phase-transformations. 75 blocks (5 mm × 5 mm × 4 mm) of Y-TZP were assigned into five groups (n = 15): (tribochemical silica coating - TBS) zirconia surface was abraded by silica coated alumina particles followed by silanization; (GLZ₁) zirconia surface received the application of a thin layer of low-fusing porcelain glaze, followed by hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching for 1 min; (GLZ₅) glaze application + HF etching by 5 min; (GLZ₁₀) glaze application + HF etching by 10 min; (GLZ₁₅) glaze application + HF etching by 15 min. After etching, all the specimens were washed, dried and silanized. Cylinders of composites (diameter: 3.25 mm; height: 3 mm) were cemented to the Y-TZP blocks using a resin cement. All the specimens were subjected to aging (10,000 thermal cycles and 90 days storage), tested under shear conditions, and finally analyzed by a stereomicroscope (failure analysis). In addition, we also performed topographical and phase transformation analyses of the treated zirconia surfaces. The TBS group presented the highest bond strength value (23.34 MPa). The glazed groups presented low bond values and high prevalences of pretest failures. X-ray diffraction analysis showed a phase transformation for the TBS group (13.14%); however, there was no clear phase change observed for the GLZ groups. From our results, we concluded that tribochemical silica coating is the main Y-TZP surface conditioning for resin bond improvements.