共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 296 毫秒
1.
2.
因稳定时间受限,传统的倍增公式导出的外推临界公式计算结果大于实测值,偏危险;文中根据新的中子倍增公式导出了外推临界计算的新公式,实例计算表明,该公式比传统的外推临界公式精确且偏安全. 相似文献
3.
Huertas R Melgosa M Oleari C 《Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision》2006,23(9):2077-2084
An investigation of the color metrics and the complexity of the CIEDE2000 formula shows that CIELAB space is inadequate to represent small-medium color differences. The OSA-UCS (Uniform Color Space) Committee has shown that no space with uniform scale for large color differences exists. Therefore the practical way for color-difference specification is a color-difference formula in a nonuniform space. First, the BFD (Bradford University) ellipses are considered in the OSA-UCS space, and their very high regularity suggests a new and very simple color-difference formula at constant luminance. Then the COM (combined) data set used for the development of the CIEDE2000 formula is considered in the OSA-UCS space, and the color-difference formula is extended to sample pairs with a different luminance factor. The value of the performance factor PF/3 for the proposed OSA-UCS-based formula shows that the formula performs like the more complex CIEDE2000 formula for small-medium color differences. 相似文献
4.
Analysis of methods for determining electromechanical couplingcoefficients of piezoelectric elements
Chang S.H. Rogacheva N.N. Chou C.C. 《IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control》1995,42(4):630-640
An important characteristic of piezoelectric elements as energy converters is the energy conversion efficiency. The electromechanical coupling coefficient (EMCC) is commonly used as a measure of a piezoelectric elements' efficiency. The latest Standard on Piezoelectric recommends that EMCC be determined by the use of the Berlincourt et al. formula for a uniform electroelastic state, and the dynamic formula by Mason for near resonance frequencies. This paper is devoted to the analysis of these two formulas along with a third formula. The EMCC of commonly seen piezoelectric elements are formulated and analyzed. The comparison of the numerical results leads us to the following conclusions: 1. The formula of Berlincourt et al. is valid only for a uniform electroelastic state, 2. The dynamic formula of Mason gives the EMCC at a frequency equal to the arithmetic mean of resonance and the corresponding antiresonance frequencies, 3. The third formula for the EMCC is valid for both the static and dynamic electroelastic state of a piezoelement, and its results are in good agreement with those found by using Berlincourt's formula and the dynamic formula of Mason 相似文献
5.
对GB50010-2002《混凝土结构设计规范》(以下简称“规范”)剪扭构件承载力计算公式以及黄靓建议的公式进行了可靠度对比分析。结果表明,对于安全等级为二级的剪扭构件,当发生脆性的剪型破坏时,规范公式的受剪可靠指标和受扭可靠指标均值分别为3.23 和3.25,不能满足GB50068-2001《建筑结构可靠度设计统一标准》(以下简称《统一标准》)3.7 的要求;当发生延性的扭型破坏时,规范公式的受剪可靠指标和受扭可靠指标分别为4.02 和2.88,亦不能满足3.2 的可靠指标要求;随着扭剪比的变化,规范公式的可靠指标变化幅度较大,受扭和受剪可靠指标之间相差较大,出现不平衡现象。黄靓建议的公式的可靠指标比规范公式高,对于两种破坏类型,可靠指标都在3.6 附近,并克服了规范公式可靠指标不平衡的缺点,但对于剪型破坏亦不满足《统一标准》3.7 的可靠指标要求。对此,该文把黄靓等人的直线模型再次缩进,提出钢筋混凝土剪扭构件修正公式并作了可靠度分析,结果表明该文修正公式的可靠指标均值在3.75 附近,能满足《统一标准》的要求。 相似文献
6.
7.
In general mass measurements are carried out in air and that’s why air buoyancy correction plays a major role in mass measurements and it is totally dependent on density of air of the laboratory during the measurement. The density of air is calculated from temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, concentration of CO2 monitored (for CIPM formula only) in the laboratory rather direct determination and for calculation of density of air, CIPM-2007 formula is recognized as most accurate formula. Since CIPM formula is very complicated formula and it is not required for less accurate measurements, different National Metrology Institutes have derived simple equations to calculate air density and those are known as approximation formulas. We had gone through a comparative analysis among different formulas of density of air to evaluate which approximation formula is most accurate compare to CIPM-2007 formula. 相似文献
8.
9.
The spot size of a single-mode waveguide was defined from the viewpoint of a least-squares fit of the field profile to a Gaussian profile. The field profile was expanded in terms of Hermite-Gaussian functions, and a new precise recursive formula for calculating the spot size was derived. It was shown that our formula is equivalent to the best fitting of the offset coupling loss to that of a Gaussian profile and keeps its form against the Fourier transform that corresponds to the diffraction in the same manner as the Gaussian profile. The accuracy of conventional formulas and our new spot-size formula was compared with the exact value defined from the viewpoint of a least-squares fit to a Gaussian profile, and it was shown that our recursive formula is the most accurate of the approximate formulas. Next we proposed a new formula for calculating the splice loss between two waveguides and showed that our formula is more accurate than the conventional one, which involves only the spot size. 相似文献
10.
线图法预测工程的疲劳寿命简单,方便。在已有预测公式的基础上,提出了预测低应力高周疲劳寿命的新公式,并进行了严密的公式推导,对一实例进行了计算并进行了验证,给出了新旧公式的预测结果,并进行了比较。 相似文献
11.
在简要导出谐振弦式传感器理论公式的基础上,阐述了修正理由,给出了修正公式,实例计算表明,修正公式能显著提高计算精度,最后,利用修正公式对所研制的50MPa谐振弦式压力传感器的标定数据进行了处理,给出了相对计算误差。 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
基于虚拟裂纹闭合法对传统压痕法测试陶瓷材料断裂韧性的数值模型进行计算,以此为基础,分析比较传统压痕法的几种典型公式识别陶瓷材料断裂韧性的测试误差和所测材料的适用范围。结果表明:传统压痕法的Anstis公式较Evans公式,Lawn公式,JISR公式和Niihara公式,在材料比功0.3≤We/Wt≤0.45时所测断裂韧性值与理论计算值较为接近,其最大误差为12.9%,测试结果相对准确;当0.45We/Wt≤0.7时,传统压痕法对陶瓷材料断裂韧性的测试误差随比功增加迅速增大,特别是当We/Wt=0.7时,Anstis公式,Evans公式,Lawn公式,JISR公式和Niihara公式所测断裂韧性值与理论计算值的最大误差分别为70%,148.5%,48.8%,98.7%和166.6%,在此材料比功范围内传统压痕法所测断裂韧性值误差较大。 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.