Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Polymer blends of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene) (abbreviated as PHS) containing 15 mol % of hydroxystyrene separately in 2‐butanone to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. The three polymer blends were found to be miscible, because all the prepared films were transparent and there was a single glass transition temperature (T_g) for each composition of the polymers. T_g elevation (above the additivity rule) is observed in all the three PMMA/PHS blends mainly because of hydrogen bonding. If less effective hydrogen bonding based on the FTIR evidence is assumed to infer less exothermic mixing, sPMMA may not be miscible with PHS over a broader range of conditions as iPMMA and aPMMA. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 431–440, 1999     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMA) (designated iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) primarily in chloroform to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PVP. The aPMMA/PVP and sPMMA/PVP blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films showed composition-dependent glass-transition temperatures (T_g). The glass-transition temperatures of the aPMMA/PVP blends are equal to or lower than weight average and can be qualitatively described by the Gordon–Taylor equation. The glass-transition temperatures of the other miscible blends (i.e., sPMMA/PVP blends) are mostly higher than weight average and can be approximately fitted by the simplified Kwei equation. The iPMMA/PVP blends were found to be immiscible or partially miscible based on the observation of two glass-transition temperatures. The immiscibility is probably attributable to a stronger interaction among isotactic MMA segments because its ordination and molecular packing contribute to form a rigid domain. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 3190–3197, 2001     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

Solvent effects on the miscibility of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(bisphenol a carbonate) blends

Blends of atactic or syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (designated as aPMMA or sPMMA) and poly(bisphenol A carbonate) (PC) were prepared from solution casting. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and chloroform were used as solvent. Experimental results indicated that the as‐cast blends from THF were quite different from the chloroform‐cast ones. After film preparation, THF‐cast blends did not show any visible phase separation. However, chloroform‐cast blends formed a phase‐separated structure. The as‐cast PC from either solvent was not completely amorphous, and had a melting point at 239–242°C, indicating a certain degree of crystallinity. In contrast, the quenched samples of aPMMA/PC blends prepared from the two solvents behaved virtually the same. They both showed aPMMA dissolves better in PC, but PC solubility in aPMMA is very little. Using sPMMA instead of aPMMA to blend with PC, different results were obtained. The quenched sPMMA/PC blends cast from THF showed only one T_g. However, immiscibility (i.e., two T_gs) was found in the same blend system when cast from chloroform. THF was believed to cause the observation of single T_g due to the following kinetic reason. sPMMA and PC were still trapped together even after THF removal in a homogeneous, but nonequilibrium state below the glass transition. Therefore, the quenched sPMMA/PC blends were not truly thermodynamically miscible. From the results of aPMMA or sPMMA with PC, increasing syndiotacticity seemed to improve the miscibility between PMMA and PC. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2842–2850, 2001     

Effect of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the phase diagram of its ternary blends

Previously, isotactic and atactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol‐A) (phenoxy) because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). However, syndiotactic PMMA was immiscible with PVPh because most of the cast films had two T_g's. On the contrary, syndiotactic PMMA was still miscible with phenoxy. According to our preliminary results, PVPh and phenoxy are not miscible. Also to our knowledge, nobody has reported any results concerning the effect of the tacticity of PMMA on its ternary blend containing PVPh and phenoxy. The miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PVPh, phenoxy, and tactic PMMA was thus investigated and reported in this article. Calorimetry was used as the principal tool to study miscibility. An approximate phase diagram of the ternary blends containing different tactic PMMA was established, probably for the first time, based on differential scanning calorimetry data. Immiscibility was found in most of the studied ternaries but a slight difference due to the effect of tacticity of PMMA was definitely observed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2720–2726, 2002     

Atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) blended with poly(3‐D(−)hydroxybutyrate): Miscibility and mechanical properties

Atactic poly(methylmethacrylate), aPMMA, was blended with poly(3‐D(−)hydroxybutyrate), PHB, up to a maximum composition of 25% of polyester, at 190°C in a Brabender‐like apparatus. The resulting blends quenched from the melt to room temperature were completely amorphous, and exhibited a single glass transition using DSC and DMTA, indicating miscibility of the components for this time–temperature history. Tensile experiments showed that at room temperature the 10/90 and 20/80 PHB/aPMMA blends exhibited higher values of strain at break, and slight decreases of the modulus and stress at break compared to neat aPMMA. The tensile energy at break was almost twice that of neat aPMMA. Tensile tests were also performed at 80°C, at which point the 25/75 and 20/80 PHB/aPMMA blends are above T_g, while the 10/90 and neat aPMMA are below T_g. The stress–strain curves obtained were functions of the physical state of the amorphous phase, and also depended on the difference between the test temperatures and T_g. In particular, comparing the neat aPMMA and the blends, decreases of the modulus and stress at break and a respectable increase in the strain at break were observed in the latter. Finally, the results were commented considering the thermal degradation of PHB in the melt during the blend preparation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 746–753, 2000     

Miscibility and phase structure of binary blends of poly(L‐lactide) and poly(vinyl alcohol)

Blend films of poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) were obtained by evaporation of hexafluoroisopropanol solutions of both components. The component interaction, crystallization behavior, and miscibility of these blends were studied by solid‐state NMR and other conventional methods, such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). The existence of two series of isolated and constant glass‐transition temperatures (T_g's) independent of the blend composition indicates that PLLA and PVA are immiscible in the amorphous region. However, the DSC data still demonstrates that some degree of compatibility related to blend composition exists in both PLLA/atactic‐PVA (a‐PVA) and PLLA/syndiotactic‐PVA (s‐PVA) blend systems. Furthermore, the formation of interpolymer hydrogen bonding in the amorphous region, which is regarded as the driving force leading to some degree of component compatibility in these immiscible systems, is confirmed by FTIR and further analyzed by ¹³C solid‐state NMR analyses, especially for the blends with low PLLA contents. Although the crystallization kinetics of one component (especially PVA) were affected by another component, WAXD measurement shows that these blends still possess two isolated crystalline PLLA and PVA phases other than the so‐called cocrystalline phase. ¹³C solid‐state NMR analysis excludes the interpolymer hydrogen bonding in the crystalline region. The mechanical properties (tensile strength and elongation at break) of blend films are consistent with the immiscible but somewhat compatible nature of these blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 762–772, 2001     

Phase behavior of binary and ternary blends of poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine), and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

Poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) (PSMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) (PS4VP) of different compositions were prepared and characterized. The phase behavior of these copolymers as binary PSMA/PS4VP mixtures or with poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) as PPO/PSMA or PPO/PS4VP and PPO/PSMA/PS4VP ternary blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This study showed that PPO was miscible with PS4VP containing up to 15 mol % 4‐vinylpyridine (4VP) but immiscible with PS4VP‐30 (where the number following the hyphen refers to the percentage 4VP in the polymer) and PSMA‐20 (where the number following the hyphen refers to the percentage methacrylic acid in the polymer) over the entire composition range. To examine the morphology of the immiscible blends, scanning electron microscopy was used. Because of the hydrogen‐bonding specific interactions that occurred between the carboxylic groups of PSMA and the pyridine groups of PS4VP, chloroform solutions of PSMA‐20 and PS4VP‐15 formed interpolymer complexes. The obtained glass‐transition temperatures (T_g's) of the PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 complexes were found to be higher than those calculated from the additivity rule. Although, depending on the content of 4VP, the shape of the T_g of the PPO/PS4VP blends changed from concave to S‐shaped in the case of the miscible blends, two T_g were observed with each PPO/PS4VP‐30 and PPO/PS4VP‐40 blend. The thermal stability of the PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 interpolymer complexes was studied by thermogravimetry. On the basis of the obtained results, the phase behavior of the ternary PPO/PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 blends was investigated by DSC. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Configurational effects on the crystalline morphology and amorphous phase behavior in poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends with tactic poly(methyl methacrylate)

Poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blends with two tactic poly(methyl methacrylate)s [PMMAs; isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (iPMMA) and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (sPMMA)], being chiral/tactic polymer pairs, were investigated with regard to their crystalline spherulite patterns, optical birefringence, and amorphous phase behavior with polarized optical microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The PHB/sPMMA and PHB/iPMMA blends exhibited upper critical solution temperatures of about 225 and 240°C, respectively, on the basis of the results of thermal analysis and phase morphology. The interactions of two constituents in the blends (PHB/iPMMA or PHB/sPMMA) were measured to be insignificantly different for the PHB/sPMMA and PHB/iPMMA blends. However, syndiotacticity in PMMA exerted a prominent effect on the alteration of the PHB spherulite morphology, whereas, by contrast, isotacticity in PMMA had almost no effect at all. At high sPMMA contents (e.g., 30 wt %) in the PHB/sPMMA blend, the spherulites were all negatively birefringent and ringless when they were crystallized at any crystallization temperature between 50 and 90°C. That is, not only was the original ring‐banded pattern in the neat PHB spherulites completely disrupted, but the optical sign was also reverted completely from positively to negatively birefringent in the sPMMA/PHB blend; this was not observed in the iPMMA/PHB one. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Compatibility studies of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)–poly(ether imide)–polycarbonate ternary blends

Binary blends of the sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)–poly(ether imide) (PEI) and SPEEK–polycarbonate (PC), and ternary blends of the SPEEK–PEI–PC, were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. SPEEK was obtained by sulfonation of poly(ether ether ketone) using 95% sulfuric acid. From the thermal analysis of the SPEEK–PEI blends, single glass transition temperature (T_g) was observed at all the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PC blends, double T_gs were observed. From the results of thermal analysis, it is suggested that the SPEEK–PEI blends are miscible and the SPEEK–PC blends are immiscible. Polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₁₂) of the SPEEK–PEI blends was calculated from the modified Lu and Weiss equation, and found to range from −0.011 to −0.825 with the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PC blends, the χ₁₂ values were calculated from the modified Flory–Huggins equation, and found to range from 0.191 to 0.272 with the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PEI–PC ternary blends, phase separation regions that showed two T_gs were found to be consistent with the spinodal curves calculated from the χ₁₂ values of the three binary blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2488–2494, 2000     

Studies of functionalized polystyrene–poly(2, 6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) blends

The phase behavior of an immiscible binary component blend and its functionalized analogs were studied. The unfunctionalized blends are composed of polystyrene and poly(2,6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), whereas the functionalized versions contain a relatively broad range of ionic content, i.e., sodium sulfonate units. Extensive glass transition (T_g) measurements show that these blends are immiscible over a broad ionic content and molecular weight range. This phenomenon, however, does not inhibit these blends from possessing improved mechanical properties since the associating-type ionic interactions can effectively bridge the two phases. These results are in contrast with blends composed of unfunctionalized but miscible components. In this case, miscibility and immiscibility can be tailored through the precise control of the level of functionalization of one or both components of the blend.     

Phase and crystallization behavior of solution-blended poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide)

Results on solution-blended poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) blends are reported. Dichloroacetic acid was used as the cosolvent for blending. PEEK and PEI are confirmed to be miscible in the melt. The glass transition, T_g, behavior obeys the simple Fox equation or the Gordon-Taylor equation with the adjustable coefficient k = 0.86. This agrees with prior data on melt-blended PEEK/PEI blends. The T_g width of the amorphous PEEK/PEI blends was found to be broader than that of the pure components. The maximum broadening is about 10°C. The specific volume of the amorphous PEEK/PEI blends shows a slight negative deviation from linearity, indicating favorable interaction between PEEK and PEI. The spherulitic growth and resultant blend morphology at 270°C were studied by a cross-polarized optical microscope. The radial growth rate of PEEK spherulites formed from the miscible melt at 270°C decreases from 3.04 μm/min for PEEK/PEI 90/10 blend to 0.77 μm/min for PEEK/PEI 70/30 blend. The decrease in crystalization rate of PEEK from PEEK/PEI blends is attributable to the increase in blend T_g. A linear growth was observed for PEEK spherulites formed from miscible melt at 270°C in the early growth stage. The spherulitic growth deviated from linearity in the late stage of growth. PEEK spherulites formed from the miscible PEEK/PEI melt at 270°C are essentially volume-filling. The branches of the spherulites become more clear for PEEK spherulites formed from the blend than that formed from pure PEEK melt.     

Effect of bisphenol A on the miscibility,phase morphology,and specific interaction in immiscible biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone)/poly(L‐lactide) blends

We have investigated the enhancement in miscibility, upon addition of bisphenol A (BPA) of immiscible binary biodegradable blends of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA). That BPA is miscible with both PCL and PLLA was proven by the single value of T_g observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses over the entire range of compositions. At various compositions and temperatures, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed that intermolecular hydrogen bonding existed between the hydroxyl group of BPA and the carbonyl groups of PCL and PLLA. The addition of BPA enhances the miscibility of the immiscible PCL/PLLA binary blend and transforms it into a miscible blend at room temperature when a sufficient quantity of the BPA is present. In addition, optical microscopy (OM) measurements of the phase morphologies of ternary BPA/PCL/PLLA blends at different temperatures indicated an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) phase diagram, since the ΔK effect became smaller at higher temperature (200°C) than at room temperature. An analysis of infrared spectra recorded at different temperatures correlated well with the OM analyses. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1146–1161, 2006     

Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly (ethyl methacrylate) with poly (vinyl phenol)

The miscibility behavior of ternary blends of poly (vinyl phenol) (PVPh)/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP)/poly (ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) was investigated mainly with calorimetry. PVPh is miscible with both PVP and PEMA on the basis of the single T_g observed over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of PVPh and the carbonyl group of PVP and PEMA at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of PVPh is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVP/PEMA and eventually transforms it into a miscible blend, especially when the ratio between PVP/PEMA is 3:1, probably because of favorable physical interaction. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1205–1213, 2006     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Miscibility of poly(p-vinyl phenol) with polymethacrylates

Summary Poly(p-vinyl phenol) is miscible with poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(n-propyl methacrylate), poly(isopropyl methacrylate), and poly(tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate), but is immiscible with poly(n-butyl methacrylate). Except for poly(p-vinyl phenol)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends, the other miscible blends show pronounced positive deviations in their glass transition temperatures. The T_g-composition curves of the five miscible blend systems can be described by the Gordon-Taylor and the Kwei equations.     

Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible binary blend of poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) with bisphenol A

The miscibility behavior and hydrogen bonding of ternary blends of bisphenol A (BPA)/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) were investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The BPA is miscible with both PVAc and PVP based on the observed single T_g over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen-bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of BPA and the carbonyl group of PVAc and PVP at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of BPA is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVAc/PVP binary blend and eventually transforms into miscible blend with single T_g, when a sufficiently quantity of the BPA is present due to the significant Δχ and the ΔK effect.     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008