A geometric view of parametric linear programming

We present a new definition of optimality intervals for the parametric right-hand side linear programming (parametric RHS LP) Problem () = min{c ^t x¦Ax =b + ¯b,x 0}. We then show that an optimality interval consists either of a breakpoint or the open interval between two consecutive breakpoints of the continuous piecewise linear convex function (). As a consequence, the optimality intervals form a partition of the closed interval {; ¦()¦ < }. Based on these optimality intervals, we also introduce an algorithm for solving the parametric RHS LP problem which requires an LP solver as a subroutine. If a polynomial-time LP solver is used to implement this subroutine, we obtain a substantial improvement on the complexity of those parametric RHS LP instances which exhibit degeneracy. When the number of breakpoints of () is polynomial in terms of the size of the parametric problem, we show that the latter can be solved in polynomial time.This research was partially funded by the United States Navy-Office of Naval Research under Contract N00014-87-K-0202. Its financial support is gratefully acknowledged.     

A Model-Theoretic Approach for Recovering Consistent Data from Inconsistent Knowledge Bases

One of the most significant drawbacks of classical logic is its being useless in the presence of an inconsistency. Nevertheless, the classical calculus is a very convenient framework to work with. In this work we propose means for drawing conclusions from systems that are based on classical logic, although the information might be inconsistent. The idea is to detect those parts of the knowledge base that cause the inconsistency, and isolate the parts that are recoverable. We do this by temporarily switching into Ginsberg/Fitting multivalued framework of bilattices (which is a common framework for logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning). Our method is conservative in the sense that it considers the contradictory data as useless and regards all the remaining information unaffected. The resulting logic is nonmonotonic, paraconsistent, and a plausibility logic in the sense of Lehmann.     

Definability of Polyadic Lifts of Generalized Quantifiers

We study generalized quantifiers on finite structures.With every function : we associate a quantifier Q by letting Q x say there are at least (n) elementsx satisfying , where n is the sizeof the universe. This is the general form ofwhat is known as a monotone quantifier of type < 1 >.We study so called polyadic liftsof such quantifiers. The particular lifts we considerare Ramseyfication, branching and resumption.In each case we get exact criteria fordefinability of the lift in terms of simpler quantifiers.     

Two and three-quarter dimensional meshing facilitators

This paper presents generated enhancements for robust two and three-quarter dimensional meshing, including: (1) automated interval assignment by integer programming for submapped surfaces and volumes, (2) surface submapping, and (3) volume submapping. An introduction to the simplex method, an optimization technique of integer programming, is presented. Simplification of complex geometry is required for the formulation of the integer programming problem. A method of i-j unfolding is defined which explains how irregular geometry can be realigned into a simplified form that is suitable for submap interval assignment solutions. Also presented is the processes by which submapping eliminates the decomposition of surface geometry, through a pseudodecomposition process, producing suitable mapped meshes. The process of submapping involves the creation of interpolated virtual edges, user defined vertex types and i-j-k space traversals. The creation of interpolated virtual edges is the method by which submapping automatically subdivides surface geometry. The interpolated virtual edge is formulated according to an interpolation scheme using the node discretization of curves on the surface. User defined vertex types allow direct user control of surface decomposition and interval assignment by modifying i-j-k space traversals. Volume submapping takes the geometry decomposition to a higher level by using mapped virtual surfaces to eliminate decomposition of complex volumes.     

A Hyperbase for Binary Lattice Hyperidentities

We define an identity to be hypersatisfied by a variety V if, whenever the operation symbols of V, are replaced by arbitrary terms (of appropriate arity) in the operations of V, the resulting identity is satisfied by V in the usual sense. Whenever the identity is hypersatisfied by a variety V, we shall say that is a V hyperidentity. For example, the identity x + x y = x (x + y) is hypersatisfied by the variety L of all lattices. A proof of this consists of a case-by-case examination of { + , } {x, y, x y, x y}, the set of all binary lattice terms. In an earlier work, we exhibited a hyperbase ^L for the set of all binary lattice (or, equivalently, quasilattice) hyperidentities of type 2, 2. In this paper we provide a greatly refined hyperbase _L . The proof that _L is a hyperbase was obtained by using the automated reasoning program Otter 3.0.4.     

On restricted one-counter machines

Let be the class of real-time nondeterministic one-counter machines whose counters make at mostone reversal. Let ₁ (respectively, ₂) be the subclass consisting of machines whose only nondeterministic move is in the choice of when to reverse the counter (respectively, when to start using the counter). ₁ and ₂ are among the simplest known classes of machines for which the universe problem has been shown undecidable. (The universe problem for a class of machines is the problem of deciding if an arbitrary machine in the class accepts all its inputs.) Here, we show that the classes of languages accepted by machines in ₁ and ₂ are incomparable. Moreover, the union of the language classes is properly contained in the class defined by . We also, briefly, look at the closure properties of these machines.This research was supported in part by NSF Grant MCS78-01736.     

‘Use’ discourses in system development: Can communication be improved?

This paper aims to provide a basis for renewed talk about use in computing. Four current discourse arenas are described. Different intentions manifest in each arena are linked to failures in translation, different terminologies crossing disciplinary and national boundaries non-reflexively. Analysis of transnational use discourse dynamics shows much miscommunication. Conflicts like that between the Scandinavian System Development School and the usability approach have less current salience. Renewing our talk about use is essential to a participatory politics of information technology and will lead to clearer perception of the implications of letting new systems becoming primary media of social interaction.     

The “explicit-implicit” distinction

Much of traditional AI exemplifies the explicit representation paradigm, and during the late 1980's a heated debate arose between the classical and connectionist camps as to whether beliefs and rules receive an explicit or implicit representation in human cognition. In a recent paper, Kirsh (1990) questions the coherence of the fundamental distinction underlying this debate. He argues that our basic intuitions concerning explicit and implicit representations are not only confused but inconsistent. Ultimately, Kirsh proposes a new formulation of the distinction, based upon the criterion ofconstant time processing.The present paper examines Kirsh's claims. It is argued that Kirsh fails to demonstrate that our usage of explicit and implicit is seriously confused or inconsistent. Furthermore, it is argued that Kirsh's new formulation of the explicit-implicit distinction is excessively stringent, in that it banishes virtually all sentences of natural language from the realm of explicit representation. By contrast, the present paper proposes definitions for explicit and implicit which preserve most of our strong intuitions concerning straightforward uses of these terms. It is also argued that the distinction delineated here sustains the meaningfulness of the abovementioned debate between classicists and connectionists.     

Scientific rationality and the ‘even stronger programme’

This is a programmatic proposal about a better use of the notion ofscientific rationality in the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK). Strangely enough, some relativistic authors in the SSK literature allow room for scientific rationality in their analyses of scientific practice. I interpret their arguments as follows: since science is essentially a collective activity, any rationality developed and sustained in science should have someinstitutional basis analysable in sociological terms. I advocate that sociologists should explain such scientific rationality, especially the asymmetry between science and nonscience, in sociological terms. In some sense, my programme is even stronger than Bloor's strong programme.     

The liberalized δ-rule in free variable semantic tableaux

In this paper we have a closer look at one of the rules of the tableau calculus presented by Fitting [4], called the -rule. We prove that a modification of this rule, called the ⁺-rule, which uses fewer free variables, is also sound and complete. We examine the relationship between the ⁺-rule and variations of the -rule presented by Smullyan [9]. This leads to a second proof of the soundness of the ⁺-rule. An example shows the relevance of this modification for building tableau-based theorem provers.     

A priori Probability That Two Qubits Are Unentangled

In a previous study (P. B. Slater, Eur. Phys. J. B. 17, 471 (2000)), several remarkably simple exact results were found, in certain specialized m-dimensional scenarios (m 4), for the a priori probability that a pair of qubits is unentangled/separable. The measure used was the volume element of the Bures metric (identically one-fourth the statistical distinguishability [SD] metric). Here, making use of a newly-developed (Euler angle) parameterization of the 4 × 4 density matrices of Tilma, Byrd and Sudarshan, we extend the analysis to the complete 15-dimensional convex set (C) of arbitrarily paired qubits—the total SD volume of which is known to be ⁸ / 1680 = ⁸/2⁴ 3 5 7 5.64794. Using advanced quasi-Monte Carlo procedures (scrambled Halton sequences) for numerical integration in this high-dimensional space, we approximately (5.64851) reproduce that value, while obtaining an estimate of 0.416302 for the SD volume of separable states. We conjecture that this is but an approximation to ⁶/2310 = ⁶ / (2 3 5 7 11) 0.416186. The ratio of the two volumes, 8/11²2 .0736881, would then constitute the exact Bures/SD probability of separability. The SD area of the 14-dimensional boundary of C is 142⁷/12285 = 2 71⁷/3³ 5 7 13 34.911, while we obtain a numerical estimate of 1.75414 for the SD area of the boundary of separable states. PACS: 03.67.-; 03.65.Ud; 02.60.Jh; 02.40.Ky     

Records of turing machines

Suppose a Turing machine is equipped with an extra tape. At each step of a computation being performed, it prints symbol read move symbol symbol printed on a square of the extra tape. It then moves the extra tape one square to the left. This procedure yields arecord of the computation.If is a finite alphabet, let be the set of triples (a, b, c) wherea ,c , andb {–1, 0, 1}. We will characterize those sequences of symbols of that are records of computations of Turing machines.This research was supported in part by AFOSR Grant GP-68-1402.     

Symbols and Computation A Critique of the Computational Theory of Mind

Over the past several decades, the philosophical community has witnessed the emergence of an important new paradigm for understanding the mind.¹ The paradigm is that of machine computation, and its influence has been felt not only in philosophy, but also in all of the empirical disciplines devoted to the study of cognition. Of the several strategies for applying the resources provided by computer and cognitive science to the philosophy of mind, the one that has gained the most attention from philosophers has been the Computational Theory of Mind (CTM). CTM was first articulated by Hilary Putnam (1960, 1961), but finds perhaps its most consistent and enduring advocate in Jerry Fodor (1975, 1980, 1981, 1987, 1990, 1994). It is this theory, and not any broader interpretations of what it would be for the mind to be a computer, that I wish to address in this paper. What I shall argue here is that the notion of symbolic representation employed by CTM is fundamentally unsuited to providing an explanation of the intentionality of mental states (a major goal of CTM), and that this result undercuts a second major goal of CTM, sometimes refered to as the vindication of intentional psychology. This line of argument is related to the discussions of derived intentionality by Searle (1980, 1983, 1984) and Sayre (1986, 1987). But whereas those discussions seem to be concerned with the causal dependence of familiar sorts of symbolic representation upon meaning-bestowing acts, my claim is rather that there is not one but several notions of meaning to be had, and that the notions that are applicable to symbols are conceptually dependent upon the notion that is applicable to mental states in the fashion that Aristotle refered to as paronymy. That is, an analysis of the notions of meaning applicable to symbols reveals that they contain presuppositions about meaningful mental states, much as Aristotle's analysis of the sense of healthy that is applied to foods reveals that it means conducive to having a healthy body, and hence any attempt to explain mental semantics in terms of the semantics of symbols is doomed to circularity and regress. I shall argue, however, that this does not have the consequence that computationalism is bankrupt as a paradigm for cognitive science, as it is possible to reconstruct CTM in a fashion that avoids these difficulties and makes it a viable research framework for psychology, albeit at the cost of losing its claims to explain intentionality and to vindicate intentional psychology. I have argued elsewhere (Horst, 1996) that local special sciences such as psychology do not require vindication in the form of demonstrating their reducibility to more fundamental theories, and hence failure to make good on these philosophical promises need not compromise the broad range of work in empirical cognitive science motivated by the computer paradigm in ways that do not depend on these problematic treatments of symbols.     

Link Travel Times II: Properties Derived from Traffic-Flow Models

We investigate the properties of travel times when the latter are derived from traffic-flow models. In particular we consider exit-flow models, which have been used to model time-varying flows on road networks, in dynamic traffic assignment (DTA). But we here define the class more widely to include, for example, models based on finite difference approximations to the LWR (Lighthill, Whitham and Richards) model of traffic flow, and large step versions of these. For the derived travel times we investigate the properties of existence, uniqueness, continuity, first-in-first-out (FIFO), causality and time-flow consistency (or intertemporal consistency). We assume a single traffic type and assume that time may be treated as continuous or as discrete, and for each case we obtain conditions under which the above properties are satisfied, and interrelations among the properties. For example, we find that FIFO is easily satisfied, but not strict causality, and find that if we redefine travel time to ensure strict causality then we lose time-flow consistency, and that neither of these conditions is strictly necessary or sufficient for FIFO. All of the models can be viewed as an approximation to a model that is continuous in time and space (the LWR model), and it seems that any loss of desirable properties is the price we pay for using such approximations. We also extend the exit-flow models and results to allow inhomogeneity over time (link capacity or other parameters changing over time), and show that FIFO is still ensured if the exit-flow function is defined appropriately.     

On characterizations of recursively enumerable languages

Summary Geffert has shown that earch recursively enumerable languageL over can be expressed in the formL{h(x) ^–1 g(x)x in ⁺} ^* where is an alphabet andg, h is a pair of morphisms. Our purpose is to give a simple proof for Geffert's result and then sharpen it into the form where both of the morphisms are nonerasing. In our method we modify constructions used in a representation of recursively enumerable languages in terms of equality sets and in a characterization of simple transducers in terms of morphisms. As direct consequences, we get the undecidability of the Post correspondence problem and various representations ofL. For instance,L =(L ₀) ^* whereL ₀ is a minimal linear language and is the Dyck reductiona, A.     

Context-free text grammars

A text is a triple=(, ₁, ₂) such that is a labeling function, and ₁ and ₂ are linear orders on the domain of ; hence may be seen as a word (, ₁) together with an additional linear order ₂ on the domain of . The order ₂ is used to give to the word (, ₁) itsindividual hierarchical representation (syntactic structure) which may be a tree but it may be also more general than a tree. In this paper we introducecontext-free grammars for texts and investigate their basic properties. Since each text has its own individual structure, the role of such a grammar should be that of a definition of a pattern common to all individual texts. This leads to the notion of ashapely context-free text grammar also investigated in this paper.     

Local determinacy of abstract local dynamical systems

O. Hájek proved in his book Dynamical Systems in the Plane (Chapter III) that there isat most one abstract local dynamical system which is locally equivalent to, or equivalently an extension of, a given elementary dynamical system, and suggested a question of finding reasonable conditions on the latter for the existence ofat least one such abstract local dynamical system. An elementary dynamical system is said to satisfy the No-Intersection Axiom and is called an abstract germ if(x ₁, t) = (x ₂,t) impliesx ₁ =x ₂. We show that is (uniquely) extendable to an abstract local dynamical system if and only if is an abstract germ, and hence the question is completely answered. After introducing various kinds of isomorphisms of abstract germs and abstract local dynamical systems corresponding to those of continuous germs and continuous local dynamical systems, we obtain some sufficient conditions for extendability of isomorphisms and possibility of restriction of them, and thus establish the local determinacy of abstract local dynamical systems up to isomorphisms in some wider categories.Dedicated to Professor Yusuke HAGIHARA in Commemoration of His Seventy-Seventh Anniversary     

Property preserving abstractions for the verification of concurrent systems

We study property preserving transformations for reactive systems. The main idea is the use of simulations parameterized by Galois connections (, ), relating the lattices of properties of two systems. We propose and study a notion of preservation of properties expressed by formulas of a logic, by a function mapping sets of states of a systemS into sets of states of a systemS'. We give results on the preservation of properties expressed in sublanguages of the branching time -calculus when two systemsS andS' are related via (, )-simulations. They can be used to verify a property for a system by verifying the same property on a simpler system which is an abstraction of it. We show also under which conditions abstraction of concurrent systems can be computed from the abstraction of their components. This allows a compositional application of the proposed verification method.This is a revised version of the papers [2] and [16]; the results are fully developed in [28].This work was partially supported by ESPRIT Basic Research Action REACT.Verimag is a joint laboratory of CNRS, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, Université J. Fourier and Verilog SA associated with IMAG.     

On a class of recursive procedures and equivalent iterative ones

Summary H. Partsch and P. Pepper gave translations for a special class of recursive procedures into equivalent iterative ones, motivated by the well-known recursive solution for the Towers of Hanoi problem. By generalizing their translations towards two directions, we investigate a class of recursive algorithms and obtain their translations, thus giving a unified view for these algorithms. Some of the included algorithms are mutually recursive procedures for plotting space-filling curves such as the Hilbert curves, and a recursive procedure by C.T. Fike which produces all the permutations of n symbols. These algorithms are characterized by the property that the values of a parameter given to recursive procedure calls in a procedure are uniform in a certain sense.     

Separating complexity classes related to bounded alternating ω-branching programs

We develop a theory of communication within branching programs that provides exponential lower bounds on the size of branching programs that are bounded alternating. Our theory is based on the algebraic concept of -branching programs, : , a semiring homomorphism, that generalizes ordinary branching programs, -branching programs [M2] andMOD _p-branching programs [DKMW].Due to certain exponential lower and polynomial upper bounds on the size of bounded alternating -branching programs we are able to separate the corresponding complexity classesN _ba ,co-N _{ba ba} , andMOD _p - _ba ,p prime, from each other, and from that classes corresponding to oblivious linear length-bounded branching programs investigated in the past.