Uniaxial tensile behavior and thermoforming characteristics of high barrier EVOH‐based blends of interest in food packaging

The uniaxial tensile characteristics of blends of an ethylene‐vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH‐32 mol% ethylene) with an amorphous PA and/or a nylon‐containing ionomer, used as barrier layer in multilayer food packaging structures, was assessed in this paper. The stress‐strain behavior of these materials at elevated temperatures and at different strain rates was examined. The stress‐strain curves obtained were used to understand the influence of temperature and strain rate on the uniaxial deformation process of the materials, these being of general importance during typical processing steps including thermoforming. A male mold for deep‐draw was used to assess the thermoforming (biaxial deformation in nature) behavior of extruded sheets at 100, 120, 140 and 150°C, and the results were broadly found to be in agreement with results from simple uniaxial tensile tests. From the preliminary thermoforming results, it was found that EVOH/aPA extruded blends did not improve the poor formability of EVOH alone. In contrast, significant improvement in thermoformability was achieved by blending EVOH with a compatibilized ionomer. Optimum forming capacity was achieved in a ternary blend by addition of a compatibilized ionomer to an EVOH/aPA blend in the range of 140°C–150°C. The ternary blend showed a lower reduction of thickness in the sidewalls, as well as a higher dimensional uniformity in the thermoformed part. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:598–608, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Influence of the ethylene–(methacrylic acid)–Zn2+ ionomer on the thermal and mechanical properties of blends of poly(propylene) (PP)/ethylene–(vinyl alcohol) copolymer (EVOH)

The thermal and mechanical properties and the morphologies of blends of poly(propylene) (PP) and an ethylene–(vinyl alcohol) copolymer (EVOH) and of blends of PP/EVOH/ethylene–(methacrylic acid)–Zn²⁺ ionomer were studied to establish the influence of the ionomer addition on the compatibilization of PP/EVOH blends and on their properties. The oxygen transmission rate (O₂TR) values of the blends were measured as well. PP and EVOH are initially incompatible as was determined by tensile tests and scanning electronic microscopy. Addition of the ionomer Zn²⁺ led to good compatibility and mechanical behaviour was improved in all blends. The mechanical properties on extruded films were studied for 90/10 and 80/20 w/w PP/EVOH blends compatibilized with 10 % of ionomer Zn²⁺. These experiments have shown that the tensile properties are better than in the injection‐moulded samples. The stretching during the extrusion improved the compatibility of the blends, diminishing the size of EVOH domains and enhancing their distribution in the PP matrix. As was to be expected, the EVOH improved the oxygen permeation of the films, even in compatibilized blends. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatible blends of polypropylene with an amorphous polyamide

Compatible polymer blends of polypropylene (PP) with an amorphous polyamide (aPA) were obtained through reactive compatibilization by adding 20% maleic anhydride‐modified copolymer (PP‐g‐MA) to the blends. The blends were made up of a pure PP phase and an aPA‐rich phase where very small amounts of PP were detected. The dispersed phase particle size decreased considerably indicating that compatibilization occurred. Young's modulus of the compatibilized blends increased with respect to that of the uncompatibilized ones. The compatibilized blends were highly ductile, and the impact strength also improved, proving that compatibilization occurred under a broad range of experimental conditions. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013     

The effects of radiation cross‐linking and process parameters on the behavior of polyamide 12 in vacuum thermoforming

Compared to amorphous thermoplastics, semi‐crystalline thermoplastics usually have a smaller processing range for thermoforming, due to their narrow temperature window for the transition from viscoelastic to viscous material behavior. On the other hand, semi‐crystalline thermoplastics offer superior properties for applications like ductility or chemical resistance. Within this article, modification of semi‐crystalline polyamide 12 by radiation cross‐linking with respect to its suitability for vacuum thermoforming as well as the effects of processing parameters and sheet thickness on the resulting strain distributions in thermoformed parts are shown. Experimental thermoforming processing studies in combination with digital image correlation measurements, thermo‐mechanical and elongational rheometry were performed to characterize the behavior of cross‐linked semi‐crystalline thermoplastics in the vacuum thermoforming process. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. ©2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Influence of ionomeric compatibilizers on the morphology and properties of amorphous polyester/polyamide blends

The utilization of sulfonated polyester ionomers as minor‐component compatibilizers in blends of an amorphous polyester and polyamide was investigated. The blends were prepared using twin‐screw extrusion and compared to solution blends to investigate the effect of elevated temperatures and shear mixing on blend miscibility and/or phase behavior. The phase domain sizes of the solution blends with respect to ionomer content were studied using small angle light scattering (SALS) and phase contrast optical microscopy. The thermal and mechanical properties of the extruded blends were investigated using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and tensile testing while the morphology was investigated using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). The interactions between the sulfonate group of the ionomer and the polyamide were characterized using FT‐IR spectroscopy. Binary blends of the amorphous polyester and polyamide were immiscible with poor mechanical properties, while blends containing the polyester ionomer as a minor‐component compatibilizer showed a significant reduction in the dispersed domain sizes and enhanced ultimate mechanical properties. The compatibilization mechanism is attributed to specific interactions between the sulfonate groups on the polyester ionomer and the amide groups of the polyamide. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:1721–1731, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

On the linear correlation between microhardness and mechanical properties in polar polymers and blends

The tensile elastic modulus (E), yield stress (σ_Y) and microhardness (MH) of neat and binary and ternary blends of glassy semicrystalline ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH), a glassy amorphous polyamide and a semicrystalline nylon‐containing ionomer covering a broad range of properties were examined. The tests were carried out on dry and water‐equilibrated samples to produce stiffer and softer materials, respectively. From the results, more accurate linear correlations were found to describe adequately the microhardness, modulus and yield stress of these strongly self‐associated polymers through hydrogen bonding. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Deformation and fracture behavior of polypropylene–ethylene vinyl alcohol blends compatibilized with ionomer Zn2+

This work investigated the deformation and fracture behavior of polypropylene–ethylene vinyl alcohol (PP/EVOH) blends compatibilized with ionomer Zn²⁺. Uniaxial tensile tests and quasistatic fracture experiments were performed for neat PP and for 10 and 20 wt % EVOH blends with different ionomer contents. The addition of EVOH copolymer to PP led to an increase in the Young's modulus whereas the yield strength was decreased with the EVOH content as a consequence of the higher stiffness of EVOH and the poor interfacial adhesion between PP and EVOH, respectively. Furthermore, the incorporation of EVOH into PP promoted stable crack growth. Neat PP displayed nonlinear load‐displacement behavior with some amount of slow crack growth preceding unstable brittle fracture, whereas most PP/EVOH blends exhibited “pseudostable” fracture characterized by slow crack growth that could not be externally controlled. All blends exhibited lower resistance to crack initiation than PP but the fracture propagation resistance was significantly improved. For 10 wt % EVOH blends, the resistance to crack initiation was roughly constant with the ionomer content up to 5%, then it increased with the further addition of compatibilizer. Conversely, for 20 wt % EVOH blends, the resistance to crack initiation appeared to be independent of the ionomer content. The better resistance to crack initiation exhibited by the 10 wt % EVOH blends could be attributed to a higher level of compatibilization in these blends. By contrast, 20 wt % EVOH blends with ≤2% ionomer content showed completely stable crack growth. In addition, J–R curves and valid plane strain fracture toughness values for these blends could also be determined. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 1271–1279, 2005     

Morphological,thermal, rheological,and mechanical properties of PP/EVOH blends compatibilized with PP‐g‐IA

We prepared some blends of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) with and without a compatibilizer. As a new compatibilizer, we synthesized polypropylene grafted with itaconic acid (PP‐g‐IA) using Brabender mixing system. We investigated the morphological, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a compatibilized blends (PP/EVOH/PP‐g‐IA) and not compatibilized blends (PP/EVOH). Our experiments showed that carboxylic acid groups in PP‐g‐IA and hydroxyl group in EVOH formed strong in situ hydrogen bond in the compatibilized blends, resulting in better morphological and mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends than those of not compatibilized blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:1240–1247, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Wall thickness distribution in thermoformed food containers produced by a Benco aseptic packaging machine

Effects of process parameters such as forming temperature, forming air pressure and heating time on wall thickness distribution in plug‐assist thermoformed food containers using multilayered material were investigated. Multilayered rollstockbase material formed into containers by thermoforming process using a Benco aseptic packaging machine. Forming temperatures in the range of 131–170°C, airforming pressures of 2, 3, 3. 5 and 4 bars, and heating times of 66, 74, 84, 97 and 114 seconds were used in the thermoforming process. Analysis of wall thickness data obtained for the thermoforming parameters used in this study showed that wall thickness was significantly affected by forming temperature, pressure and heating time at 0.05 significance level. Besides the processing parameters, wall location, container side, and their interactions significantly affected wall thickness. Forming temperature was found to be the principle parameter influencing wall thickness distribution in a plug‐assist thermoforming operation. The optimum operating conditions of the packaging machine for the thermoforming process are: 146–156°C for forming temperature, 2–4 bars for air‐forming pressure and 74–97 seconds for heating time.     

Blends of poly(propylene) and polyacetal compatibilized by ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymers

Polymer blends of poly(propylene) (PP) and polyacetal (polyoxymethylene, POM) with ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymers were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), rheological, tensile, and impact measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The PP–POM–EVOH blends were extruded with a co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder. The ethylene group in the EVOH is partially miscible with PP, whereas the hydroxyl group in the EVOH can form hydrogen bonding with POM. The EVOH tends to reside along the interface, acting as a surfactant to reduce the interfacial tension and to increase the interfacial adhesion between the blends. Results from SEM and mechanical tests indicate that a small quantity of the EVOH copolymer or a smaller vinyl alcohol content in the EVOH copolymer results in a better compatibilized blend in terms of finer phase domains and better mechanical properties. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1471–1477, 2003     

Compatibilizers for thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer/polyethylene blends prepared by reactive mixing

This paper describes the effects of composition and processing conditions on the efficiency of the compatibilizer prepared from a thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer (TLCP) and the sodium salt of a poly(ethylene‐co‐r‐acrylic acid) ionomer (EAA‐Na) in TLCP/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) blends and TLCP/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) blends. The TLCP‐ionomer graft copolymer formed by a melt acidolysis reaction effectively reduced the interfacial tension between TLCP and polyethylene, which improved impact strength and toughness of the compatibilized blends. Higher processing temperatures for the reactive extrusion produced a more efficient compatibilizer, presumably due to increased graft‐copolymer formation, but the reaction temperature had little effect on the impact strength of compatibilized blends for temperatures above 300°C. The addition of the compatibilizer to TLCP/LDPE blends significantly increased the melt viscosity due to increased interfacial adhesion. The TLCP/EAA‐Na ratio used to prepare the compatibilizer had little effect on the performance of the compatibilizer. Although the compatibilizer can be prepared in situ by blending and extruding a ternary blend of TLCP/EAA‐Na/polyethylene, pre‐reacting the compatibilizer resulted in blends with improved toughness and elongation.     

Use of a sodium ionomer as a compatibilizer in polypropylene/high‐barrier ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer blends: The processability of the blends and their physical properties

The effect of a sodium ionomer (ion.Na⁺) on the compatibility of polypropylene (PP)/high‐barrier ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) blends was studied in terms of the thermal, mechanical, and optical properties and morphology. The rheological behavior, tensile tests, and morphology of the binary blends showed that the miscibility of EVOH with PP was very poor. The miscibility of the polymers improved with the ionomer addition. In general, the ion.Na⁺ concentration did not alter the thermal behavior of the blends, but it did improve the ductility of the injection‐molded specimens. Scanning electron micrographs displayed better adhesion between the PP and EVOH phases in the samples with the ionomer. The mechanical improvement was better in the film samples than in the injection‐molded samples. A 90/10 (w/w) PP/EVOH film with 5% ion.Na⁺ and an 80/20 (w/w) PP/EVOH film with 10% ion.Na⁺ presented better global properties than the other blends studied. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1763–1770, 2004     

A probe into the status quo of interfacial adhesion in the compatibilized ternary blends with core/shell droplets: Selective versus dictated compatibilization

A simple approach was applied to probe into the situation of interfacial adhesion in the compatibilized ternary polymer blends with core/shell morphology. The performance of compatibilization was discussed in terms of thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties analyses for blends prepared through different mixing strategies for which maleic anhydride‐grafted high‐density polyethylene (HDPE‐g‐MAH) could be localized at the interface of HDPE/poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) copolymer (EVOH) or HDPE/polyamide 6 (PA‐6) in their ternary blends. Two mixing strategies, one simultaneously (one‐step or selective) and two sequentially (two‐step or dictated), were performed, compared, and discussed. It was found that mixing policy (dictated or selective) significantly changes the interfacial adhesion, as signaled by variations in rheological and thermal properties. In the case of mechanical properties, facilitation of stress transfer across the matrix/shell/core interfaces was detected by calculation of semi‐experimental models' coefficients. It was found that one‐step mixing or selective localization of HDPE‐g‐MAH helps in accumulation of more compatibilizer molecules at the interface HDPE/EVOH or EVOH/PA‐6. By contrast, addition of compatibilizer to minor phase (masterbatch of EVOH and PA‐6) or to HDPE matrix alone in case of two‐step blending causes imperfect stress transfer. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45503.     

Wall thickness distribution in plug-assist vacuum formed strawberry containers

An experimental study on the influence of processing parameters namely film temperature, plug velocity, and temperature on wall thickness distribution in plug-assist vacuum thermoformed fresh strawberry container using high-impact polystyrene is presented. Film temperatures of 118, 125, 136, 150, and 165°C, plug velocities of 0.15, 0.20, and 0.27 m/s, and plug temperatures of 25, 60, 100, 123, and 135°C were used in the thermoforming. Increasing the plug velocity resulted in improved wall thickness distribution due to elastic deformation of the plastic sheet during thermoforming. Decreasing the stretching time and the temperature difference between the plastic film and plug was important for good wall thickness distribution. Better wall thickness was obtained at the plug velocity of 0.27 m/s and the plug temperature of 123°C.     

The effect of interface characteristics on the morphology,rheology and thermal behavior of three‐component polymer alloys

Immiscible polymer blends are interesting multiphase host systems for fillers. Such systems exhibit, within a certain composition limits, either a separate dispersion of the two minor phases or a dispersion of encapsulated filler particles within the minor polymer phase. Both thermodynamic (e.g. interfacial tension) and kinetic (e.g. relative viscosity) considerations determine the morphology developed during the blending process. The effect of interfacial characteristics on the structure‐property relationships of ternary polymer alloys and blends comprising polypropylene (PP), ethylene‐vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and glass beads (GB), or fibers (GF), was investigated. The system studied was based on a binary PP/EVOH immiscible blend, representing a blend of a semi‐crystalline apolar polymer with a semicrystalline highly polar copolymer. Modification of the interfacial properties was obtained through using silane coupling agents for the EVOH/glass interface and compatibilization using a maleic anhydride grafted PP (MA‐g‐PP) for the PP/EVOH interface. The compatibilizer was added in a procedure aimed to preserves the encapsulated EVOH/glass structure. Blends were prepared by melt extrusion compounding and specimens by injection molding. The morphology was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high resolution SEM (HRSEM), the shear viscosity by capillary rheometry and the thermal behavior using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The system studied consisted of filler particles encapsulated by EVOH, with some of the minor EVOH component separately dispersed within the PP matrix. Modification of the interfaces resulted in unique morphologies. The aminosilane glass surface treatment enhanced the encapsulation in the ternary [PP/EVOH]GB blends, resulting in an encapsulated morphology with no separtely dispersed EVOH particles. The addition of a MA‐g‐PP compatibilizer preserves the encapsulated morphology in the ternary blends with some finely dispersed EVOH particles and enhanced PP/EVOH interphase interactions. The viscosity of the binary and ternary blends was closely related to the blend's morphology and the level of shear rate. The treated glass surfaces showed increased viscosity compared to the cleaned glass surfaces in both GB and GF containing ternary blends. Both EVOH and glass serve as nucleating agents for the PP matrix, affecting its crystallization process but not its crystalline structure. The aminosilane glass surface treatment completely inhibited the EVOH crystallization process in the ternary blend. In summary, the structure of the multicomponent blends studied has a significant effect on their behavior as depicted by the rheological and thermal behavior. The structure‐performance relationships in the three‐component blends can be controlled and varied.     

The effect of interface characteristics on the static and dynamic mechanical properties of three‐component polymer alloys

The effect of interfacial characteristics on the structure‐property relationships of ternary polymer alloys and blends comprising polypropylene (PP), ethylene‐vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and glass beads (GB) or fibers (GF) was investigated. The systems studied were based on a binary PP/EVOH immiscible blend, representing a blend of a semi‐crystalline apolar polymer with a semi‐crystalline highly polar copolymer. The ternary systems studied consisted of filler particles encapsulated by EVOH, with some of the minor EVOH component separately dispersed within the PP matrix. Modification of the interfacial properties was done using silane coupling agents for the EVOH/glass interface and compatibilization using a maleic anhydride grafted PP (MA‐g‐PP) for the PP/EVOH interface. Both glass fillers increased the dynamic modulus and decreased the damping of the neat polymers and of their binary blends, especially in the rubbery region. GF has a more profound effect on both the modulus and the damping. Glass surface treatments and compatibilization have only a marginal effect on the dynamic mechanical behavior of the ternary blends. Yet, compatibilization shifted the polymers' T_gS to higher temperatures. Both glass fillers increased the elastic modulus of the binary blends, where GF performed better than GB as a reinforcing agent. GF slightly increased the strength of the binary blends while, GB reduced it. Both fillers reduced the ductility of the binary blends. The blends' mechanical properties were related to the morphology and their components' crystallinity. The compatibilizer increases both stiffness and strength and reduces deformability.     

Structure and mechanical properties of blends of an amorphous polyamide and an amorphous copolyester

This article deals with the structure and mechanical properties of blends of an amorphous copolyester (PCTG) and an amorphous polyamide (aPA) which were directly prepared during the plasticization step of an injection molding process. The blends were composed by an almost pure aPA phase, and a PCTG‐rich phase where some aPA subparticles are present. The morphology of the blends showed both rather fine dispersed particles and occasionally large particles with occluded subparticles. This complex morphology indicated a low interface tension attributed to the presence of some aPA in the PCTG‐rich phase of the blends. The almost linear behavior of the modulus of elasticity was attributed to the constancy of the main structural characteristics upon blending and the equally linear ductility to the good adhesion level and the presence of thin and elongated morphologies. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40785.     

Effects of addition of acrylic compatibilizer on the morphology and mechanical behavior of amorphous polyamide/SAN blends

Amorphous polyamide (aPA)/acrylonitrile‐styrene copolymer (SAN) blends were prepared using methyl methacrylate‐maleic anhydride copolymer MMA‐MA as compatibilizer. The aPA/SAN blends can be considered as a less complex version of the aPA/ABS (acrylonitrilebutadiene‐styrene) blends, due to the absence of the ABS rubber phase in the SAN material. It is known that acrylic copolymer might be miscible with SAN, whereas the maleic anhydride groups from MMA‐MA can react in situ with the amine end groups of aPA during melt blending. As a result, it is possible the in situ formation of aPA‐g‐MMA‐MA grafted copolymers at the aPA/SAN interface during the melt processing of the blends. In this study, the MA content in the MMA‐MA copolymer and its molecular weight was varied independently and their effects on the blend morphology and stress–strain behavior were evaluated. The morphology of the blends aPA/SAN showed a minimum in the SAN particle size at low amounts of MA in the compatibilizer, however, as the MA content in the MMA‐MA copolymer was increased larger SAN particle sizes were observed in the systems. In addition, higher MA content in the compatibilizer lead to less ductile aPA/SAN blends under tensile testing. The results shown the viscosity ratio also plays a very important role in the morphology formation and consequently on the properties of the aPA/SAN blends studied. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Polyamide 6/ethylene‐butylene elastomer blends generated via anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam: Phase morphology and dynamic mechanical behavior

This paper reports about the polymerization of ε‐caprolactam monomer in the presence of low molecular weight hydroxyl or isocyanate end‐capped ethylene‐butylene elastomer (EB) elastomers as a new concept for the development of a submicron phase morphology in polyamide 6 (PA6)/EB blends. The phase morphology, viscoelastic behavior, and impact strength of the polymerization‐designed blends are compared to those of similar blends prepared via melt‐extrusion of PA6 homopolymer and EB elastomer. Polyamide 6 and EB elastomer were compatibilized using a premade triblock copolymer PA6‐b‐EB‐b‐PA6 or a pure EB‐b‐PA6 diblock reactively generated during melt‐blending (extrusion‐prepared blends) or built‐up via anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam on initiating ? NCO groups attached to EB chain ends (polymerization‐prepared blends). Two compatibilization approaches were considered for the polymerization‐prepared blends: (i) the addition of a premade PA6‐b‐EB‐b‐PA6 triblock copolymer to the ε‐caprolactam monomer containing nonreactive EB? OH elastomer and (ii) generation in situ of a PA6‐b‐EB diblock using EB? NCO precursor on which polyamide 6 blocks are built‐up via anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam. The noncompatibilized blends exhibit a coarse phase morphology, either in the extruded or the polymerization prepared blends. Addition of premade triblock copolymer (PA6‐b‐EB‐b‐PA6) to a EB? OH /ε‐caprolactam dispersion led to a fine EB phase (0.14 μm) in the PA6 matrix after ε‐caprolactam polymerization. The average particle size of the in situ reactively compatibilized polymerization‐prepared blend is about 1 μm. The notched Izod impact strength of the blend compatibilized with premade triblock copolymer was much higher than that of the neat PA6, the noncompatibilized, and the in situ reactively compatibilized polymerization blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 2538–2544, 2004     

A comparison of the thermoformability of a PPE/PP blend with thermoformable ABS. Part I: Small deformation methods

Different factors important in ascertaining the thermoformability of polymeric materials are identified and defined. These include resistance to sag, ease of flow, mold replication, deep draw capability, sensitivity to thermoforming temperature and speed, uniformity of thickness distribution, and post‐forming shrinkage and dimensional stability. Methods to study these properties can be classified into small deformation and large deformation methods. The small deformation methods, which are the subject of this paper, include dynamic temperature sweep tests, dynamic frequency sweep tests, stress relaxation time, and creep recovery tests. These tests were used to compare the thermoformabilities of a blend of polyphenylene ether (PPE) and polypropylene (PP) and thermoformable acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) resin. The dynamic temperature and frequency tests showed that the PPE/PP blend generally has a better viscoelastic balance than ABS implying a better balance between resistance to sag and ease of flow. Creep recovery tests suggested that the PPE/PP blend may offer better mold replication during thermoforming. Studies based on the stress relaxation time showed a lower residual stress build‐up in thermoformed PPE/PP blend than ABS implying better dimensional stability and a higher in‐service temperature window for the thermoformed PPE/PP blend than ABS. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1369–1376, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers